首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Education and Health Promotion >Factors related to the international research collaboration in the health area: A qualitative study
【24h】

Factors related to the international research collaboration in the health area: A qualitative study

机译:与卫生地区国际研究合作有关的因素:一个定性研究

获取原文
       

摘要

BACKGROUND: International research collaboration (IRC) is known as one of the important indicators of productivity, efficiency, and validity of universities in the world. In other words, IRC is necessary for the scientific trade-off between researchers in international scientific societies. The study aimed to address the experiences of an academic researcher about factors related to IRC. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The present study was conducted using a qualitative approach and conventional content analysis method. The participants consisted of 19 experienced faculty members and researchers from Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, who were selected based on the purposive and snowball sampling techniques. Data were collected through semi-structured interviews and were analyzed using the content analysis technique. Guba and Lincoln's evaluative criteria, including credibility, confirmability, dependability, and transferability, were applied to evaluate the trustworthiness of the study. RESULTS: According to the research findings, factors of “personal skills,” “personality,” “professional position,” and “scientific activities” under the category of personal factors; “rules and regulations” and “equipment and facilities” under the organizational factors; and “domestic policies” and “foreign policies” were identified under the government factors category. CONCLUSION: Research collaborations are influenced by individual, intra-academic, and extra-academic factors; thus, research policymakers can help further to enhance the quantity and quality of scientific output and promote the university's placing in international rankings through providing conditions that enable international interactions.
机译:背景:国际研究协作(IRC)被称为世界上大学的生产力,效率和有效性的重要指标之一。换句话说,IRC是国际科学社会研究人员之间的科学权衡所必需的。该研究旨在解决与IRC相关因素的学术研究员的经验。材料和方法:使用定性方法和常规含量分析方法进行本研究。参与者由来自伊斯法罕的医学科学大学的19名经验丰富的教职员工和研究人员组成,他们是根据目的地和雪球采样技术选择的。通过半结构化访谈收集数据,并使用内容分析技术进行分析。 Gub和Lincoln的评价标准,包括可信度,可确认性,可靠性和可转移性,以评估该研究的可信度。结果:根据研究结果,“个人技能”的因素,“个性”,“专业立场”和个人因素类别下的“科学活动”; “规则和规则”和“设备和设施”在组织因素下;根据政府因素类别确定了“国内政策”和“外国政策”。结论:研究合作受个人,学术学术和学术因素的影响;因此,研究政策制定者可以通过提供能够实现国际互动的条件,进一步提高科学产出的数量和质量,并促进大学在国际排名中放置国际排名。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号