首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Economics and Sustainable Development >Rural Household Livelihood Strategies Choices: The Case of Humbo Woreda, Wolaita Zone, Southern Nation Nationalities and Peoples Regional State, Ethiopia
【24h】

Rural Household Livelihood Strategies Choices: The Case of Humbo Woreda, Wolaita Zone, Southern Nation Nationalities and Peoples Regional State, Ethiopia

机译:农村家庭生计策略选择:洪波瓦登,沃特拉区,南方民族和人民区域国家,埃塞俄比亚

获取原文
       

摘要

This study was initiated to identify the rural livelihood strategies choices with special emphasis to Humbo Woreda of Wolaita Zone of SNNPR of Ethiopia. The main objectives of the study were, to identify the existing livelihood strategies choices in the study area and to identify the determinants of rural households` choice of livelihood strategies. Both primary and secondary data sources were used and a total of 140 rural households were contacted. The study results reveal that majority (57.9%) of the sample households participated in agriculture plus non/off-farm livelihood strategies choices to pursue their livelihood. Out of the total sample households, 42.1% households derive their livelihoods from agriculture 19.3% households combined agriculture and nonfarm livelihood strategy activities, 25 % of households combine agriculture and off farm livelihood strategies choices and the rest 13.6 % of households combined agriculture, off farm and nonfarm livelihood strategies choices. The result of this study shows that drought, crop pests and diseases, livestock diseases are the most common problems raised by the respondents. About 45% respondents reported that drought is the major challenges in their area. About 8 strategies choices were being practiced by the households in the area as a reaction against vulnerability. Among all households, 28.6% of the households participate in different petty trade 18.6% of households participate in different forms of daily labor in the nearby town Humbo. The multinomial logit model analysis shows that out of the total sixteen explanatory variables entered into the model three variables including age, family size (AE) and annual income were influencing rural household choice of livelihood strategies choices of agriculture plus nonfarm activities at different significant level. Out of the sixteen total explanatory variables entered for determining agriculture plus off farm livelihood strategies choices seven variables includes age, sex, family size, total land size, access to training, Cosmopoliteness and participation in social leadership had influenced rural household choice of livelihood strategies choices of agriculture plus nonfarm activities at different significant level. Furthermore from sixteen explanatory variables entered to the model eight variables including age, sex, family size (AE), total land size, distance to market, annual cash income, dependency ratio and remittance had influenced the rural household choice of livelihood strategies choices of agriculture plus nonfarm plus off farm activities at different significant level. Factors which were influence the livelihood choice of household needs attention from concerned bodies for alleviating the situations in the area. Therefore Woreda office of agriculture and concerned bodies in the woreda and around improve the livelihoods of rural households through creating conducive environment for non/off farm activities
机译:本研究开始识别农村生计战略选择,特别强调埃塞俄比亚SNNPR的沃特拉地区的沃特拉地区。该研究的主要目标是确定研究区域的现有生计战略选择,并确定农村家庭的决定因素的生计战略选择。主要和二级数据源都被使用,共接触了140家农村家庭。研究结果表明,大多数(57.9%)的样本家庭参加了农业加上非/非农业生计战略选择,以追求其生计。出于全面的样本家庭,42.1%的家庭从农业生计19.3%的家庭联合农业和非农生命战略活动中,25%的家庭结合了农业和农业生计战略选择,其余的13.6%的家庭联合农业,off Farm和非农生计战略选择。本研究结果表明,畜禽疾病的干旱,作物害虫和疾病是受访者提出的最常见的问题。约有45%的受访者报告说,干旱是其地区的主要挑战。该地区的家庭作为对脆弱性的反应来实施约8战略选择。在所有家庭中,28.6%的家庭参与不同的小型贸易,18.6%的家庭参加了附近城镇洪波的不同形式的日常劳动力。多项式Lo​​git模型分析表明,在包括年龄,家庭规模(AE)和年收入的模型三个变量中输入的十六个解释变量中,影响农村家庭的生计战略选择不同大幅度的非法活动。在为确定农业加上农业生计战略选择七个变量包括年龄,性别,家庭规模,总土地规模,获得培训,层次和参与社会领导地位的十六个变量,影响了农村家庭的生计策略选择农业加上非耐旱在不同大幅度的活动。此外,从十六个解释性变量输入到模型八个变量,包括年龄,性别,家庭大小(AE),总土地大小,距离市场距离,年度现金收入,抚养比和汇率影响影响农村家庭的生计战略选择的农业选择加上非耐旱性在不同大幅度的农场活动。影响民生家庭选择的因素需要有关机构的关注,以减轻该地区的情况。因此,伍德农业和有关机构办公室在翁尔和周围改善了农村家庭的生计,通过为非/关闭农场活动创造有利环境

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号