...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Clinical Research Best Practices >What Am I Missing Here? Thought-Provoking Questions for the Clinical Research Industry
【24h】

What Am I Missing Here? Thought-Provoking Questions for the Clinical Research Industry

机译:我在这里遗漏了什么?临床研究行业的思想挑衅性问题

获取原文

摘要

Sites often complain that study sponsors do not treat them with the respect they deserve. They want to be treated like customers, not vendors, which is what they actually are. Of course, most sites employ physicians, who might very well have a warm spot on their prescription pads for the study sponsor’s products — thus the origin of the wonderfully corrupt “seeding study.” But is this distinction missing the point: We are all people and all deserving of respect— now isn’t that a lot simpler? What am I missing here.
机译:遗迹往往抱怨学习赞助商不会以其应得的尊重对待他们。他们希望像客户一样对待,而不是供应商,这是他们实际的。当然,大多数网站都雇用了医生,他们可能在他们的处方垫上有一个温暖的位置,用于研究赞助商的产品 - 因此是荒谬腐败的“种子研究”的起源。但是,这种区别错过了这一点:我们都是人们,所有值得尊重 - 现在并不是那么简单得多?我在这里遗漏了什么。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号