...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Clinical & Translational Endocrinology >Association between obesity phenotypes of insulin resistance and risk of type 2 diabetes in African Americans: The Jackson Heart Study
【24h】

Association between obesity phenotypes of insulin resistance and risk of type 2 diabetes in African Americans: The Jackson Heart Study

机译:非洲裔美国人胰岛素抵抗肥胖表型与2型糖尿病风险的关系:杰克逊心脏研究

获取原文

摘要

ObjectiveTo determine whether insulin resistance (IR) measured by homeostasis model of insulin resistance (HOMA-IR) can further stratify diabetes risk in African Americans (AAs) beyond obesity and identify obese, low risk and non-obese, high risk individuals.MethodsUsing the Jackson Heart Study cohort, we categorized participants without diabetes into four phenotypes: non-obese/insulin-sensitive, non-obese/IR, obese/insulin-sensitive and obese/IR. Obesity was defined as BMI?≥?30 or BMI 25–30 plus an increased waist circumference. IR was defined as HOMA-IR?≥?2. We used modified Poisson regression models to estimate the incident risk-ratios (IRR) of diabetes across these phenotypes adjusting for potential confounders and HbA1c.ResultsAmong 3219 AAs without diabetes, 14.0% were non-obese/insulin-sensitive, 24.6% non-obese/IR, 6.2% obese/insulin-sensitive, and 55.3% obese/IR. The overall crude incidence rate of diabetes was 29.91 cases/1000 person-years. In fully-adjusted models, compared to the non-obese/insulin-sensitive group, the relative risk of diabetes was highest in obese/IR (IRR?=?2.35; 95% CI: 1.53, 3.60), followed by non-obese/IR (IRR?=?1.59; 95% CI: 1.02, 2.46), and non-significant for the obese/insulin-sensitive (IRR?=?1.70; 95% CI: 0.97, 2.99) group.ConclusionsHOMA-IR can further stratify diabetes risk in AA adults beyond obesity, identifying non-obese high-risk and lower-risk obese individuals. However, diabetes risk should still be carefully monitored in obese populations despite insulin sensitivity.
机译:ObjectiveTo确定胰岛素抵抗(HOMA-IR)的稳态抵抗(IR)是否测量的胰岛素抵抗(HOMA-IR)可以进一步分析非洲裔美国人(AAS)的糖尿病风险,超越肥胖,并识别肥胖,低风险和非肥胖,高风险个体。方法杰克逊心脏研究队列,我们​​将没有糖尿病的参与者分类为四种表型:非肥胖/胰岛素敏感,非肥胖/红外,肥胖/胰岛素敏感和肥胖/红外。肥胖被定义为BMI?≥?30或BMI 25-30加上腰围增加。 IR被定义为HOMA-IR?≥?2。我们使用了改进的泊松回归模型来估算这些表型对潜在混淆和HBA1c.Resultsamong 3219 Aas而没有糖尿病的任何表型的事件风险比(IRR),14.0%是非肥胖/胰岛素敏感的24.6%的非肥胖/ IR,6.2%肥胖/胰岛素敏感,55.3%肥胖/红外。糖尿病的总体粗缘发病率为29.91例/ 1000人。在完全调整的模型中,与非肥胖/胰岛素敏感组相比,肥胖/红外糖尿病的相对风险最高(IRR?=?2.35; 95%CI:1.53,3.60),其次是非肥胖/ IR(IRR?=?1.59; 95%CI:1.02,2.46),对肥胖/胰岛素敏感的非显着性(IRR?=?1.70; 95%CI:0.97,2.99)Group.conclusionshoma-IR可以在肥胖的AA成年人中进一步分层糖尿病风险,确定非肥胖的高风险和低风险肥胖个体。然而,尽管胰岛素敏感性,仍然应在肥胖群体中仔细监测糖尿病风险。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号