...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Cancer Research and Therapeutics >Transarterial chemoembolization combined with microwave ablation versus microwave ablation only for Barcelona clinic liver cancer Stage B hepatocellular carcinoma: A propensity score matching study
【24h】

Transarterial chemoembolization combined with microwave ablation versus microwave ablation only for Barcelona clinic liver cancer Stage B hepatocellular carcinoma: A propensity score matching study

机译:Cranterial Chemoembolization与微波消融相结合,微波消融仅适用于巴塞罗那临床肝癌阶段B肝细胞癌:倾向得分匹配研究

获取原文
           

摘要

Purpose: We aimed to compare the outcomes of microwave ablation (MWA) alone with those of transarterial chemoembolization combined with MWA (TACE-MWA) for Barcelona clinic liver cancer (BCLC) Stage B hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and to identify the prognostic factors associated with the two treatments. Materials and Methods: This retrospective study was conducted in 150 BCLC Stage B HCC patients from April 2006 to November 2017. Of these, 88 patients were treated with MWA alone while 62 with TACE-MWA. Propensity score matching (PSM) was conducted to adjust for imbalances in clinical parameters. Procedure-related complications, local tumor progression (LTP), recurrence-free survival (RFS), and overall survival (OS) were analyzed. Results: Before PSM, the maximal tumor diameters were 6.0 ± 1.0 cm and 6.7 ± 1.3 cm in the TACE-MWA and MWA groups, respectively, with a significant difference (P = 0.002); a significant difference was also detected in α-fetoprotein level (P = 0.013). After PSM, no difference was found in the two parameters (P = 0.067, 0.470). Before and after PSM, no difference was detected in the procedure-related complications (P = 0.803 vs. 1.000, P = 1.000 vs. 1.000), RFS (P = 0.786 vs. 0.689), and OS (P = 0.684 vs. 0.929). Tumor size and α-fetoprotein level were independent influencing factors for OS before and after PSM (P = 0.009, 0.023), while tumor size (D 7) was an independent risk factor for poor OS (P = 0.011). Tumor number was an independent risk factor for RFS before and after PSM (P = 0.007 vs. P = 0.008). A significant difference was detected in LTP between the two groups with single tumor before and after PSM (P = 0.059 vs. P = 0.006). Conclusions: The MWA alone group had RFS and OS comparable to that of the TACE-MWA group. TACE-MWA was effective in controlling LTP in patients with a single tumor.
机译:目的:我们旨在将微波消融(MWA)的结果与Cryarterial Chemoembolization联合的MWA(TACE-MWA)进行比较,用于巴塞罗那临床肝癌(BCLC)阶段B肝细胞癌(HCC),并确定相关的预后因素用两种治疗方法。材料和方法:该回顾性研究于2006年4月至2017年11月的150例BCLC阶段B HCC患者进行。其中88名患者单独用MWA治疗,而TACE-MWA。进行倾向评分匹配(PSM)以调整临床参数中的不平衡。分析了程序相关的并发症,局部肿瘤进展(LTP),无复发存活(RF)和总存活(OS)。结果:在PSM之前,在TACE-MWA和MWA组中,最大肿瘤直径分别为6.0±1.0厘米和6.7±1.3厘米,差异显着(p = 0.002);在α-胎蛋白水平中也检测到显着差异(p = 0.013)。 PSM后,在两个参数中没有发现差异(P = 0.067,0.470)。在PSM之前和之后,在程序相关的并发症中没有差异(P = 0.803与1.000,P = 1.000 vs.1000),RFS(P = 0.786与0.689)和OS(P = 0.684与0.929 )。肿瘤大小和α-胎蛋白水平是PSM之前和之后的OS的独立影响因子(P = 0.009,0.023),而肿瘤大小(D> 7)是差的OS的独立危险因素(P = 0.011)。肿瘤数是PSM之前和之后RFS的独立危险因素(P = 0.007 Vs.p = 0.008)。在PSM之前和之后的两组与单颗粒中的两组之间的LTP中检测到显着差异(P = 0.059 Vs. <0.006)。结论:MWA仅与TACE-MWA集团的RFS和OS相当。 TACE-MWA有效地控制患有单一肿瘤的LTP。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号