首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Cancer Research and Therapeutics >A comparative study of concomitant boost radiation versus concomitant boost with concurrent chemoradiation versus standard fractionation chemoradiation in locally advanced head-and-neck cancer
【24h】

A comparative study of concomitant boost radiation versus concomitant boost with concurrent chemoradiation versus standard fractionation chemoradiation in locally advanced head-and-neck cancer

机译:伴随促进辐射与伴随化学校长的伴随升压与局部晚期头颈癌的标准分馏化学校长的对比研究

获取原文
           

摘要

Context: As the number of head-and-neck cancer (HNC) patients are high in our subcontinent, the study was designed to reduce the treatment time and increase efficacy. Aims: Comparative evaluation of the efficacy, toxicity, local control, and survival of concomitant boost radiotherapy (CBRT), CBRT with concurrent chemoradiation (CBRT + CCT) and conventionally fractionated radiotherapy with concomitant chemotherapy (CFRT + CCT) in locally advanced HNC (LAHNC). Materials and Methods: Patients with LAHNC were randomly assigned to 3-groups of 30-patients each. Group I (CBRT) received, 45 Gy/25#/5-weeks and 18 Gy/10# concomitant boost in the last 2-week of treatment, receiving a total dose of 63 Gy. Group II (CBRT + CCT) received CBRT with concomitant cisplatin 75 mg/m sup2/sup on day 1, 17, and 34. Group III (CFRT + CCT) received 64 Gy/32#/6.2 weeks, concurrent with injection cisplatin 75 mg/m sup2/sup on day 1, 22, and 42. Statistical Analysis Used: Stata 9.0 SPSS and Chi-square test were used for analysis and disease-free survival (DFS) rates were calculated using the Kaplan–Meier method. Results: The median follow-up period was 8.2 months. At last follow-up, locoregional control was 36%, 57%, and 40% and DFS was seen in 33%, 53%, and 40% of patients in Group I, II, and III, respectively. Grade-3 cutaneous reactions were significantly higher in Group-II as compared to that of Group-III (P = 0.033) and Group-I (P = 0.715). Conclusion: All three groups have similar response rates and DFS with manageable toxicity.
机译:背景:随着我们次大陆的头颈癌(HNC)患者的数量高,研究旨在减少治疗时间并提高疗效。目的:伴随促进放疗(CBRT),CBRT的疗效,毒性,局部控制和存活率的比较评价(CBRT + CCT)和常规分级放疗当地晚期HNC(LAHNC)伴随化疗(CFRT + CCT)(LAHNC )。材料和方法:LahnC患者随机分配给3组30例。收到的群体(CBRT),45 GY / 25#/ 5周和18 Gy / 10#伴随在最后2周的治疗中提升,接受了63 Gy的总剂量。 II族(CBRT + CCT)接受CBRT,CBRT在第1,17天和第34天的伴随顺铂75mg / m 2 。III组(CFRT + CCT)接受64 GY / 32#/ 6.2周,在第1,22天和第42天的注射顺铂同时与注射顺铂75mg / m 2 。使用的统计分析:STATA 9.0 SPSS和Chi-Square试验用于分析和无病的生存率(DFS)率使用Kaplan-Meier方法计算。结果:中位后续期间为8.2个月。最后随访,招生控制分别为36%,57%和40%,分别观察到II,II和III组患者的33%,53%和40%。与基团-II(P = 0.033)和基团-I(p = 0.715)相比,3级-3级皮肤反应显着较高。结论:所有三组具有类似的响应率和DFS,具有可管理的毒性。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号