首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Bangladesh College of Physicians and Surgeons >Evaluation of chemotherapy response between Paclitaxel-Cisplatin, Paclitaxel -Gemcitabine and Gemcitabine - Cisplatin among non - resectable lung cancer patients, A retrospective study in tertiary care hospital.
【24h】

Evaluation of chemotherapy response between Paclitaxel-Cisplatin, Paclitaxel -Gemcitabine and Gemcitabine - Cisplatin among non - resectable lung cancer patients, A retrospective study in tertiary care hospital.

机译:紫杉醇 - 顺铂,紫杉醇 - 新霉三胺和吉西他滨 - 顺铂 - 富集肺癌患者中的化疗响应评价,第三型护理医院回顾性研究。

获取原文
           

摘要

Background : To compare the survival rate of paclitaxel plus cisplatin (PC arm), paclitaxel plus gemcitabine (PG arm) and gemcitabine plus cisplatin (GC arm) in chemotherapy patients with non resectable lung cancer. Methods : This was a retrospective observational study to evaluate chemotherapy response among non resectable lung cancer patients with their survival at cancer center CMH, Dhaka since 01 July 2013 to 31 March 2015. One hundred fifty-four (154) non resectable lung cancer patients were randomly divided into three groups, 50 patients in PC arm, 51 patients in PG arm and 53 patients in GC arm. In PC arm paclitaxel 175 mg/m2 (day 1) with cisplatin 75mg/m2 (day 1), in PG arm Paclitaxel 175 mg/m2 (day 1) with gemcitabine 1000 mg/m2 (days 1 and 8) and in GC arm gemcitabine 1000 mg/m2 (days 1 and 8) with cisplatin 100mg/m2 (day 1). Results : Patients characteristics were similar between the three groups. The overall response rate was 40% in the PC arm,43.1% in the PG arm, 43.4% in the GC arm. The median survival time in PC arm was 8.5 months, in PG arm was 8.8 months, in GC arm was 9.2 months. The major side effect was myelosuppression which accounts 71% patients. The average treatment costs were 57% and 30% lower in PC arm as compared with GC and PG arm respectively. Conclusion : The median survival time, disease free survival time and 1-year survival rate in PC, PG, GC arms without significant difference. Treatment were well tolerable; quality of life parameter was mostly similar but paclitaxel with cisplatin was most cost effective than others chemotherapy regimen.
机译:背景:比较紫杉醇加发热铂(PC ARM),紫杉醇加吉西他滨(PG ARM)和Gemcitabine Plus顺铂(GC ARM)在化疗患者中的不可切除肺癌的患者的存活率。方法:这是评估非可重复肺癌患者的化疗反应,以自2013年7月1日至2015年7月31日以来,达卡对癌症中心CMH患者的生存期进行评估化疗反应.130分。一百五十四(154)名不可切除的肺癌患者随机分为三组,PC臂50名患者,PG手臂51例,GC臂53例。在PC ARM紫杉醇175mg / m2(第1天),具有顺铂75mg / m 2(第1天),在PG ARM紫杉醇175mg / m 2(第1天),吉西他滨1000mg / m 2(天1和8)和GC臂吉西他滨1000 mg / m 2(第1天和第8天),顺铂100mg / m2(第1天)。结果:三组之间的患者特性相似。 PC ARM的整体反应率为40%,PG ARM中的43.1%,GC臂43.4%。 PC ARM中位生存时间为8.5个月,在PG ARM为8.8个月,GC ARM为9.2个月。主要副作用是髓质抑制,占71%的患者。与GC和PG臂相比,平均处理成本分别为PC臂的57%和30%。结论:中位生存时间,无病生存时间和1年的PC,PG,GC臂的存活率,无显着差异。治疗良好耐受;生活质量参数大多是相似的,但具有顺铂的紫杉醇比其他化疗方案最具成本效益。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号