首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Applied Communications >A Pilot Qualitative Case Study of Agricultural and Natural Resources Scientists’ Twitter Usage for Engaging Public Audiences
【24h】

A Pilot Qualitative Case Study of Agricultural and Natural Resources Scientists’ Twitter Usage for Engaging Public Audiences

机译:农业和自然资源科学家推特式案例研究,从事公共观众的推特

获取原文
           

摘要

Scientists are frequently asked to broadly share their expertise and research with a variety of audiences, beyond typical academic circles in their home disciplines. That could include developing community engagement programs, school outreach, leveraging online social networks, and other activities. The purpose of this study was to examine U.S. agricultural and natural resources (ANR) scientists’ typical science communication channels, their experiences utilizing Twitter for sharing their knowledge, research, and engaging in online public science discussion. Diffusion of Innovations theory and the model of science in-reach versus outreach guided this study. Researchers used a qualitative case study design. Data collection included ANR scientist interviews (n = 8) and application of Internet-based research methods for observing scientists’ Twitter activities. Four themes emerged from the data: 1) academic journals and conferences as scientists’ typical communication channels, yet Extension efforts help to broaden audiences, 2) scientists expected research to be peer-reviewed before public dissemination to combat misinformation and spreading of ‘junk science’, 3) scientists balanced professionalism, personalization, promotion, and Twitter hashtags for engagement, and 4) scientist-identified barriers to using Twitter included lack of time and avoiding heated discussions. Recommendations include revisiting scientists’ job descriptions and expectations for online science engagement. Also, there should be continual development and implementation of science communication training for scientists targeting best Twitter practices, growing followers for outreach beyond academic colleagues and groups, using visuals for online engagement, intentional scheduling for social media, and how to effectively navigate heated online discussions.
机译:科学家们经常被要求广泛地分享他们的专业知识和研究,这些观众超越其家庭纪律的典型学术界。这可能包括开发社区参与计划,学校外联,利用在线社交网络以及其他活动。本研究的目的是审查美国农业和自然资源(ANR)科学家典型的科学传播渠道,他们利用Twitter分享他们的知识,研究和参与在线公科讨论的经验。创新理论的扩散与科学模式与外展的达视模式引导了这项研究。研究人员使用了一个定性案例研究设计。数据收集包括ANR科学家访谈(n = 8),以及基于互联网的研究方法的应用,用于观察科学家的推特活动。从数据中出现的四个主题:1)学术期刊和会议作为科学家典型的沟通渠道,但延长努力有助于扩大受众,2)科学家预期的研究,在公共传播之前对同行评审,以打击垃圾科学的误导和传播',3)科学家均衡的专业性,个性化,促销和Twitter Hashtags参与,4)科学家识别使用Twitter的障碍包括缺乏时间和避免加热讨论。建议包括重新审视科学家的职位描述和在线科学参与的期望。此外,应该持续开发和实施科学家的科学家,针对最佳推特措施,越来越多的追随者以超越学术同事和团体的追随者,利用在线参与,故意安排社交媒体,以及如何有效地导航在线讨论。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号