首页> 外文期刊>JMIR Research Protocols >Effectiveness of Educational Interventions to Increase Knowledge of Evidence-Based Practice Among Nurses and Physiotherapists in Primary Health Care: Protocol for a Systematic Review
【24h】

Effectiveness of Educational Interventions to Increase Knowledge of Evidence-Based Practice Among Nurses and Physiotherapists in Primary Health Care: Protocol for a Systematic Review

机译:教育干预措施在初级卫生保健中提高循证循证事业知识的有效性:系统审查议定书

获取原文
       

摘要

Background The implementation of evidence-based practice (EBP) in daily health care practice is strongly encouraged; it is widely recognized as a means to improve the quality and safety of health care for patients and reduce avoidable costs. Primary care nurses and physiotherapists face numerous challenges in trying to ensure that they deliver effective daily care. Broadly promoted educational interventions aim to increase the integration and implementation of EBP in their daily practice. Objective This systematic review will retrieve and evaluate publications examining the effectiveness of educational interventions to increase the integration and implementation of EBP among nurses, nurse practitioners, and physiotherapists active in primary care. Methods We will conduct a systematic review of published articles in relevant professional, scientific journals (from their start dates) and in the following electronic databases, from inception until October 31, 2020: Medline Ovid SP (from 1946), PubMed (NOT Medline[sb]; from 1996), Embase.com (from 1947), CINAHL Ebesco (from 1937), the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials Wiley (from 1992), PsycINFO Ovid SP (from 1806), Web of Science Core collection (from 1900), PEDro (from 1999), the JBI Database of Systematic Reviews and Implementation Reports (from 1998), and the Trip Database (from 1997). We will use the predefined search terms of “evidence-based practice,” “nurses,” or “physiotherapists” and combinations with other terms, such as “educational interventions.” We will also conduct a hand search of the bibliographies of all the relevant articles and a search for unpublished studies using Google Scholar, the ProQuest Dissertations and Theses dissemination, Mednar, WorldCat, OpenGrey, and Grey Literature Report. We will consider publications in English, French, German, and Portuguese. Results The electronic database searches were completed in October 2020. Retrieved articles are currently being screened, and the entire study is expected to be completed by March 2021. Conclusions This systematic review will provide specific knowledge about the effectiveness of educational interventions to increase the implementation and integration of EBP in the daily practice of nurses and physiotherapists providing primary care services. Its findings will inform us about the types and frequencies of the most successful educational interventions.
机译:背景技术强烈鼓励在日常医疗保健实践中实施基于证据的实践(EBP);广泛认为是提高患者保健质量和安全性的手段,并降低可避免的成本。初级保健护士和物理治疗师在试图确保他们提供有效的日常护理时面临着许多挑战。促进教育干预措施旨在增加日常练习中EBP的整合和实施。目的这一系统审查将检索和评估审查教育干预措施的有效性,以增加初级保健中活跃的护士中EBP的融合和实施的效果。方法我们将对已发表的专业,科学期刊(从他们的开始日期)和以下电子数据库中发表的文章进行系统审查,从2002年10月31日开始,Medline Ovid SP(1946年),PubMed(不是Medline [ SB];从1996年),Embase.com(从1947年起),Cocahl Ebesco(1937年起),受控试验的Cochrane中央登记术(从1992年起),Psycinfo Ovid SP(从1806年起),科学核心系列(来自1900),Pedro(从1999年起),JBI数据库系统审查和实施报告(1998年)和旅行数据库(从1997年起)。我们将使用“基于证据的实践”,“护士”或“物理治疗师”的预定义的搜索条件,以及与其他术语的组合,例如“教育干预”。我们还将掌握所有相关文章的书目和搜索未发表的研究,使用Google Scholar,Proquest论文和论文,Mednar,Worldcat,Opengrey和灰色文学报告。我们将考虑英语,法语,德语和葡萄牙语的出版物。结果电子数据库搜索于10月20日完成。目前正在筛选检索物,预计整个研究将于3月2021日完成。结论这一系统审查将提供关于增加执行情况的有效性的具体了解EBP在护士和物理治疗师的日常实践中整合提供初级保健服务。其调查结果将向我们通知我们最成功的教育干预措施的类型和频率。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号