首页> 外文期刊>JMIR mHealth and uHealth >Data Imputation and Body Weight Variability Calculation Using Linear and Nonlinear Methods in Data Collected From Digital Smart Scales: Simulation and Validation Study
【24h】

Data Imputation and Body Weight Variability Calculation Using Linear and Nonlinear Methods in Data Collected From Digital Smart Scales: Simulation and Validation Study

机译:数据归档和体重可变性计算使用从数字智能量表收集的数据中的线性和非线性方法:仿真和验证研究

获取原文
           

摘要

Background Body weight variability (BWV) is common in the general population and may act as a risk factor for obesity or diseases. The correct identification of these patterns may have prognostic or predictive value in clinical and research settings. With advancements in technology allowing for the frequent collection of body weight data from electronic smart scales, new opportunities to analyze and identify patterns in body weight data are available. Objective This study aims to compare multiple methods of data imputation and BWV calculation using linear and nonlinear approaches Methods In total, 50 participants from an ongoing weight loss maintenance study (the NoHoW study) were selected to develop the procedure. We addressed the following aspects of data analysis: cleaning, imputation, detrending, and calculation of total and local BWV. To test imputation, missing data were simulated at random and using real patterns of missingness. A total of 10 imputation strategies were tested. Next, BWV was calculated using linear and nonlinear approaches, and the effects of missing data and data imputation on these estimates were investigated. Results Body weight imputation using structural modeling with Kalman smoothing or an exponentially weighted moving average provided the best agreement with observed values (root mean square error range 0.62%-0.64%). Imputation performance decreased with missingness and was similar between random and nonrandom simulations. Errors in BWV estimations from missing simulated data sets were low (2%-7% with 80% missing data or a mean of 67, SD 40.1 available body weights) compared with that of imputation strategies where errors were significantly greater, varying by imputation method. Conclusions The decision to impute body weight data depends on the purpose of the analysis. Directions for the best performing imputation methods are provided. For the purpose of estimating BWV, data imputation should not be conducted. Linear and nonlinear methods of estimating BWV provide reasonably accurate estimates under high proportions (80%) of missing data.
机译:背景技术体重变异性(BWV)在一般人群中是常见的,并且可以作为肥胖或疾病的危险因素。对这些模式的正确鉴定可能具有临床和研究环境中的预后或预测值。通过技术进步,允许从电子智能尺度频繁收集体重数据,可以使用新的分析和识别体重数据模式的新机会。目的本研究旨在比较多种数据载荷和BWV计算的方法,使用线性和非线性方法进行总共50种参与者从持续的减肥维持研究(Nohow研究)进行选择以制定该程序。我们解决了数据分析的以下几个方面:总和局部BWV的清洁,归咎,争取和计算。为了测试估算,随机模拟缺失数据并使用缺失的真实模式。测试了10个估算策略。接下来,使用线性和非线性方法计算BWV,并研究了缺失数据和数据归档对这些估计的影响。结果使用与卡尔曼平滑的结构建模或指数加权移动平均值的体重估算提供了与观察值的最佳协议(均均线误差范围0.62%-0.64%)。归责性能随着缺失而减少,随机和非谐波模拟之间具有相似。缺失模拟数据集的BWV估计中的误差低(2%-7%,80%缺失数据或67,SD 40.1可用体重)的均值与估算策略相比,误差明显更大,通过估算方法变化而变化。结论赋予体重数据的决定取决于分析的目的。提供了最佳性能载体方法的方向。出于估计BWV,不应进行数据载荷。估计BWV的线性和非线性方法在高比例(80%)的缺失数据下提供合理准确的估计。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号