首页> 外文期刊>JGH OPEN >Postoperative complications are main reason for noncompliance with enhanced recovery after surgery program in patients undergoing hepatectomy and pancreatectomy
【24h】

Postoperative complications are main reason for noncompliance with enhanced recovery after surgery program in patients undergoing hepatectomy and pancreatectomy

机译:术后并发症是在接受肝切除术和胰腺切除术后的手术计划后增强恢复的主要原因

获取原文
           

摘要

Background and Aim Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocols are reported to improve postoperative outcomes in patients undergoing a routine protocol and postoperative outcomes in patients undergoing hepatic and pancreatic resections at our institution. Methods A total of 99 consecutive patients at a single institution managed with a similar ERAS protocol were divided into the “early” (50 patients) and “late” (49 patients) cohorts. Both cohorts were statistically identical in demographics and range of surgical procedures performed. Postoperative complications, readmission, reoperation rates, and length of stay were analyzed. Categorical variables were statistically compared using Fisher's exact test and continuous variables using t ‐test and Mann–Whitney U‐test when appropriate. Results There were 32 hepatectomies/18 pancreatectomies in the “early” cohort and 22 hepatectomies/29 pancreatectomies in the “late” cohort. The overall complication rate was 38.8%, with a 30‐day readmission rate and reoperation rate of 16.1 and 5%, respectively. There was one mortality (1%). Group‐specific overall complication rate (40 vs 38.7%, P = 0.8), readmission rate (20 vs 12.2%, P = 0.4), reoperation rate (6 vs 4%, P = 1.0), and mortality (2 vs 0%, P = 1.0) were not statistically significant between both groups. Conclusions Despite similar rates of adherence to the established ERAS 24 protocol, there was no improvement in median length of stay (7?days) between the “early” and “late” groups. The only reason for noncompliance with the ERAS protocol was development of surgery‐related complications.
机译:背景和目的在手术(ERAS)方案后增强的恢复据报道,据报道,在我们机构接受肝癌和胰腺切除患者的患者中提高患者患者的术后结果。方法使用类似的ERAS议定书管理的单个机构共有99名连续99名患者分为“早期”(50名患者)和“晚期”(49名患者)的队列。在人口统计数据和外科手术范围内,两组队列都在统计上相同。分析了术后并发症,入院,重新进入率和逗留时间。使用Fisher的精确测试和连续变量使用T -Test和Mann-Whitney U-Test进行了统计变量。结果“早期”队列和22个肝切除术/ 29孔切除术中有32个肝切除术/ 18孔切除术在“晚期”队列中。整体并发症率为38.8%,分别为30天的阅览率和重组率为16.1和5%。有一个死亡率(1%)。组特异性整体并发症率(40 vs 38.7%,P = 0.8),阅约率(20 vs 12.2%,p = 0.4),重组率(6 vs 4%,p = 1.0),死亡率(2 vs 0% ,P = 1.0)两组之间没有统计学意义。结论尽管遵守既定时代24议定书的依赖性相似,但“早期”和“晚期”群体之间的中位数(7?天)没有改善。与ERAS议定书不合规的唯一原因是与外科有关的并发症的发展。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号