...
首页> 外文期刊>Dentistry Journal >Imaging Software Programs for Reliable Mathematical Measurements in Orthodontics
【24h】

Imaging Software Programs for Reliable Mathematical Measurements in Orthodontics

机译:成像软件程序,用于在矫正器中可靠的数学测量

获取原文
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Aim: To evaluate the reliability of linear and angular measurements taken using different software programs in orthodontics. Materials and Methods: A sample of four software programs from different manufacturers, namely MicroDicom viewer, Photoshop ? CS3, AutoCAD ? , and Image-Pro ? , were used for measuring the geometric features of four types of miniscrews from different manufacturers. Each miniscrew type presented a group: Group I, Tomas ? (Dentaurum, Ispringen, Germany); Group II, HUBIT ? (HUBIT, Gyeonggi-do, Korea); Group III, AbsoAnchor ? (Dentos, Daegu, Korea); and Group IV, Creative (Creative, Zhejiang, China). Measurements of apical face angle, thread angle, lead angle, flank, pitch depth, and width were taken on 45 × magnification scanning electron microscope images of the shafts of the miniscrews. One assessor measured the seven geometric features for the four types of miniscrews using the four software programs twice in two sessions separated by a three week interval. Results: Pairwise comparisons, for each of the four miniscrew groups, showed that the only common result observed was the significant difference ( p 0.001) between measurements of flank taken by the four software programs. When measurements of the four types of miniscrews were pooled into one group, a high degree of intra-rater reliability (ICC range from 0.9 to 1.0) for all the seven geometric features was found with all the four software programs. The paired t -test showed insignificant difference (at p ≤ 0.05) between the first and second measurements, except for a few measurements including pitch width measured by Image-Pro ? ( p = 0.012), MicroDicom ( p = 0.023), and Photoshop ? ( p = 0.001). Conclusions: Results did not give absolute superiority to one software program over the others and suggested an assessor effect. Assessor estimates could have been affected, among other factors, by the design of the miniscrews and the technical features of the software programs.
机译:目的:评估使用不同软件术中的线性和角度测量的可靠性在矫正器中使用不同的软件程序。材料和方法:来自不同制造商的四个软件程序的样本,即Microdicom Viewer,Photoshop? CS3,AutoCAD?和图像专业人士? ,用于测量来自不同制造商的四种类型的迷你螺钉的几何特征。每个迷你媒体类型呈现一个组:群体,托马斯? (德国德国,伊斯坦伦);第II集团,召唤? (汉英,京畿道,韩国);第三组,阿群客队? (Dentos,Daegu,韩国);和第四组,创意(Creative,浙江)。在迷你螺丝轴的轴的轴的倍率扫描电子显微镜图像上拍摄了顶角,螺纹角,铅角,侧翼,俯仰深度和宽度的测量。一个评估员使用四个软件程序的四种类型的四种类型的迷你螺丝中的七种几何特征在三个星期间隔分隔的两个会话中进行两次。结果:对四个迷路组中的每一个的成对比较显示,观察到的唯一常见结果是四个软件程序拍摄的侧面测量之间的显着差异(P <0.001)。当汇集到一组四种类型的迷你螺丝的测量时,所有四个软件程序都发现了所有四个几何特征的高度帧内可靠性(ICC范围为0.9到1.0)。成对的T -Test在第一和第二测量之间显示出无关紧要的差异(在p≤0.05),除了几测定,包括通过图像Pro测量的间距宽度? (p = 0.012),微摩擦(p = 0.023)和photoshop? (p = 0.001)。结论:结果对其他软件计划没有绝对优势,并提出了评估员的影响。评估员估算可能受到迷你螺丝的设计和软件程序的技术特征的影响。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号