首页> 外文期刊>Human reproduction open. >Corrigendum: Endometrial receptivity enhancement through induced injury and repair during ovarian stimulation: the Receptivity Enhancement by Follicular-phase Renewal after Endometrial ScratcHing (REFRESH) trial protocol
【24h】

Corrigendum: Endometrial receptivity enhancement through induced injury and repair during ovarian stimulation: the Receptivity Enhancement by Follicular-phase Renewal after Endometrial ScratcHing (REFRESH) trial protocol

机译:勘察:子宫内膜接受能力通过卵巢刺激期间诱导和修复:子宫内膜划伤(刷新)试验方案后卵泡相更新的接受性提高

获取原文
           

摘要

Human Reproduction Open, Volume 2017, Issue 3, 2017, hox022, The authors would like to apologise for a mistake that was in the originally published version of this article. The mistakes are as follows: Page 5, line 90: the original version reads "Using a conservative approach, we proceeded with the calculation of the adequate sample size needed to detect an increase of 10% (from 32% to 42%) in the intervention group using a two-side Fischer's exact test with a significance level (alpha) of 0.05", when it should correctly read "Using a conservative approach, we proceeded with the calculation of the adequate sample size needed to detect an increase of 15% (from 32% to 47%) in the intervention group using a two-sided Fischer's exact test with a significance level (alpha) of 0.05". We apologise for this error. This has always been the correct sample size calculation, as demonstrated by our submission to clinicaltrials.gov ( , states in the section "outcome measures", below "clinical pregnancy rate"), which, as can be noted in the history track changes, was submitted and remained unaltered since February 10th, 2014. However, at the time we submitted the protocol for publication in HRO, we unfortunately made a typing mistake which went unnoticed.
机译:人类繁殖开放,2017年第3卷,2017年第3,2017号,作者谨此向本文最初发表版本的错误道歉。错误如下:第5条第90行:原始版本“使用保守方法,我们进行了检测增加10%(从32%到42%)所需的适当样品大小的计算干预组使用双侧费舍的精确测试,具有0.05“的意义水平(alpha),当它应该正确读取”使用保守方法时,我们进行了检测需要增加15%所需的适当样品尺寸的计算(从干预组的32%到47%)使用双面费舍的精确测试,其意义水平(alpha)为0.05“。对于这个错误,我们深表歉意。这始终是正确的样本大小计算,如我们提交给Clincacktrials.gov(“结果措施”部分中的“临床妊娠率”部分)所证明的,如“临床妊娠率”),这可以在历史记录变化中注意到,自2014年2月10日起,已提交并仍未改变。但是,当我们提交HRO的出版议定书时,我们不幸的是造成了一个不受表情的错误。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号