首页> 外文期刊>Health and Quality of Life Outcomes >The effectiveness of integrated care interventions in improving patient quality of life (QoL) for patients with chronic conditions. An overview of the systematic review evidence
【24h】

The effectiveness of integrated care interventions in improving patient quality of life (QoL) for patients with chronic conditions. An overview of the systematic review evidence

机译:综合护理干预措施在提高慢性病症患者患者患者寿命质量(QOL)中的有效性。系统审查证据概述

获取原文
       

摘要

To determine the effectiveness of integrated care interventions in improving the Quality of Life (QoL) for patients with chronic conditions. A review of the systematic reviews evidence (umbrella review). Medline, Embase, ASSIA, PsychINFO, HMIC, CINAHL, Cochrane Library (including HTA database), DARE, and Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews), EPPI-Centre, TRIP and Health Economics Evaluations databases. Reference lists of included reviews were searched for additional references not returned by electronic searches. English language systematic reviews or meta-analyses published since 2000 that assessed the effectiveness of interventions in improving the QoL of patients with chronic conditions. Two reviewers independently assessed reviews for eligibility, extracted data, and assessed the quality of included studies. A total of 41 reviews assessed QoL. Twenty one reviews presented quantitative data, 17 reviews were narrative and three were reviews of reviews. The intervention categories included case management, Chronic care model (CCM), discharge management, multidisciplinary teams (MDT), complex interventions, primary vs. secondary care follow-up, and self-management. Taken together, the 41 reviews that assessed QoL provided a mixed picture of the effectiveness of integrated care interventions. Case management interventions showed some positive findings as did CCM interventions, although these interventions were more likely to be effective when they included a greater number of components. Discharge management interventions appeared to be particularly successful for patients with heart failure. MDT and self-management interventions showed a mixed picture. In general terms, interventions were typically more effective in improving condition-specific QoL rather than global QoL. This review provided the first overview of international evidence for the effectiveness of integrated care interventions for improving the QoL for patients with chronic conditions.
机译:确定综合护理干预措施在提高慢性病症患者的生活质量(QOL)的有效性。对系统评论证据(伞审查)的审查。 Medline,Embase,Assia,Psychinfo,HMIC,Cinahl,Cochrane图书馆(包括HTA数据库),敢,Cochrane数据库系统评论,EPPI中心,旅行和健康经济评估数据库。录取的参考列表被搜索了电子搜索未返回的其他参考。自2000年以来发表的英语语言系统评价或荟萃分析评估了干预措施在改善慢性病症患者的QoL方面的有效性。两位审查员独立评估了资格,提取数据的审查,并评估了包括研究的质量。共有41条评论评估QoL。二十一项审查显示了量化数据,17条评论是叙述和三个评论。干预类别包括案例管理,慢性护理模型(CCM),出院管理,多学科团队(MDT),复杂的干预措施,主要与二级护理随访和自我管理。占据了41条评论,评估QOL提供了综合护理干预效果的混合图片。案例管理干预表明,尽管这些干预措施在包括更多组件时,这些干预措施更有可能是有效的。患有心力衰竭患者似乎对患者似乎特别成功。 MDT和自我管理干预们展示了混合画面。一般而言,干预措施通常更有效地改善特定条件的QOL而不是全球QOL。本综述提供了国际证据综合护理干预措施有效性的第一次概述,用于改善慢性病患者的QoL。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号