...
首页> 外文期刊>Health Research Policy and Systems >Implementation of government-directed policy in the hospital setting: a modified Delphi study
【24h】

Implementation of government-directed policy in the hospital setting: a modified Delphi study

机译:在医院环境中实施政府导演的政策:改进的德尔福研究

获取原文
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

BACKGROUND:In the last 20 years governments have sought to introduce policy that improves the quality of care provided in hospitals, yet little research has been done to understand how these policies are implemented, factors that affect the implementation process or what should be considered by decision-makers during policy development or implementation planning. Experts with real-life experience in the introduction and implementation of policy are best placed to provide valuable insight into practical issues that affect implementation and the associated outcomes of these policies.METHODS:A modified Delphi study of experts in hospital policy development and implementation was undertaken to investigate factors influencing the implementation of government-directed policy in the hospital setting. This study built on the findings of two previous studies - a qualitative study of clinician perspectives of policy implementation and a systematic review and meta-synthesis, in which common contextual factors and policy characteristics associated with policy implementation were ascertained. International experts with extensive experience in government-directed policy implementation at global, national, corporate, jurisdictional and organisational levels were asked to provide opinions on predetermined factors and the feasibility of considering these in policy development and implementation planning. Survey design and analysis was guided by the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research.RESULTS:Eleven experts from four countries and with different health system perspectives participated in the study. Consensus was reached on the importance of all predetermined factors in the first survey round with additional factors for investigation highlighted by participants for examination in subsequent rounds. On study completion, expert consensus was reached on 24 factors of importance; only 20 of these factors reached consensus for feasibility.CONCLUSIONS:Study findings indicated that, whilst there are multiple factors of importance in policy implementation across all Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research domains, some factors, such as establishment of roles and responsibilities for implementation and organisational lines of accountability, are feasible for consideration at a hospital level only. In addition, four factors did not reach consensus in terms of feasibility, indicating that it may not be practical to consider all factors of importance when implementing policy; this has important implications for implementation planning and resource allocation.
机译:背景:在过去的20年中,各国政府试图引入提高医院提供的护理质量的政策,但是已经完成了很少的研究,以了解如何实施这些政策,影响实施过程的因素或决定应考虑的是什么 - 在政策制定或实施规划期间的制造商。具有现实生活经验的专家,在政策的介绍和实施中最佳地提供有价值的洞察力,这对影响执行的实际问题以及这些政策的相关成果。方法:进行了修改的德尔福研究医院政策制定和实施的专家研究调查影响医院环境中政府导向政策实施的因素。本研究建立了两项研究的调查结果 - 对政策实施的临床医生视角和系统审查和荟萃综合的定性研究,其中确定了与政策实施相关的常见上下文因素和政策特征。在全球,国家,企业,司法管辖区和组织层面的政府导向政策实施方面具有丰富经验的国际专家,要求提供关于预定因素的意见和考虑这些政策制定和实施规划的可行性。调查设计和分析由综合实施研究框架指导。结果:来自四个国家的11个专家和不同的健康系统视角参加了该研究。对第一次调查中的所有预定因素的重要性达成了共识,其中包括参与者在随后的一轮检查中突出的调查的额外因素。在研究完成时,24个重要因素达成了专家共识;这些因素中只有20个达成了可行性的共识。结论:研究结果表明,在执行研究领域的所有综合框架中,在所有综合框架中有多种重要性的重要因素,一些因素,包括建立和组织的角色和责任问责制度,仅供医院级别考虑。此外,四个因素在可行性方面没有达成共识,表明在实施政策时考虑所有重要因素可能并不实际;这对实施规划和资源分配具有重要意义。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号