...
首页> 外文期刊>Health Research Policy and Systems >Non-communicable diseases: mapping research funding organisations, funding mechanisms and research practices in Italy and Germany
【24h】

Non-communicable diseases: mapping research funding organisations, funding mechanisms and research practices in Italy and Germany

机译:非传染性疾病:绘制研究资金组织,意大利和德国的资金机制和研究实践

获取原文
           

摘要

Evidence shows that territorial borders continue to have an impact on research collaboration in Europe. Knowledge of national research structural contexts is therefore crucial to the promotion of Europe-wide policies for research funding. Nevertheless, studies assessing and comparing research systems remain scarce. This paper aims to further the knowledge on national research landscapes in Europe, focusing on non-communicable disease (NCD) research in Italy and Germany. To capture the architecture of country-specific research funding systems, a three-fold strategy was adopted. First, a literature review was conducted to determine a list of key public, voluntary/private non-profit and commercial research funding organisations (RFOs). Second, an electronic survey was administered qualifying RFOs. Finally, survey results were integrated with semi-structured interviews with key opinion leaders in NCD research. Three major dimensions of interest were investigated - funding mechanisms, funding patterns and expectations regarding outputs. The number of RFOs in Italy is four times larger than that in Germany and the Italian research system has more project funding instruments than the German system. Regarding the funding patterns towards NCD areas, in both countries, respiratory disease research resulted as the lowest funded, whereas cancer research was the target of most funding streams. The most reported expected outputs of funded research activity were scholarly publication of articles and reports. This cross-country comparison on the Italian and German research funding structures revealed substantial differences between the two systems. The current system is prone to duplicated research efforts, popular funding for some diseases and intransparency of research results. Future research will require addressing the need for better coordination of research funding efforts, even more so if European research efforts are to play a greater role.
机译:证据表明,领土边界继续对欧洲的研究合作产生影响。因此,对国家研究结构背景的了解对促进欧洲的研究资金政策至关重要。然而,评估和比较研究系统的研究仍然稀缺。本文旨在进一步了解欧洲国家研究景观的知识,重点是意大利和德国的非传染病(NCD)研究。为了捕获特定国家的研究资金系统的架构,采用了三倍的策略。首先,进行了文献综述,以确定关键公众,自愿/私人非营利和商业研究资金组织(RFO)的清单。其次,管理资格RFO的电子调查。最后,调查结果与半结构化访谈与NCD研究中的关键意见领导相结合。调查了三大兴趣维度 - 有关产出的资金机制,资金模式和期望。意大利的RFO数量比德国的RFO数量大4倍,意大利研究系统拥有比德国系统更多的项目资助仪器。关于NCD地区的资金模式,在两国,呼吸系统疾病研究导致最低资助,而癌症研究是大多数资金流的目标。最多报告资助研究活动的预期产出是学术出版文章和报告。这种越野与意大利和德国研究资金结构的比较显示了两种系统之间的大量差异。目前的系统容易发生重复的研究工作,为某些疾病和研究结果的顽固性的流行资金。未来的研究需要解决更好地协调研究资金努力的必要性,即使欧洲的研究努力也在发挥更大的作用。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号