...
首页> 外文期刊>Hand >Relationships Between Vein Repairs, Postoperative Transfusions, and Survival in Single Digit Replantation
【24h】

Relationships Between Vein Repairs, Postoperative Transfusions, and Survival in Single Digit Replantation

机译:静脉维修,术后输血与单位数字重新种植中生存之间的关系

获取原文
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Background: The general teaching is that increased number of vein repairs in digit replantation leads to improved venous outflow, resulting in lower need for iatrogenic bleeding, lower postoperative transfusion requirements, and better survival rates. The purpose of this study was to determine whether the traditional teaching that emphasizes the repair of multiple veins per arterial anastomosis results in superior survival rates. Methods: A retrospective review of a single urban replant center’s single-digit replants distal to the mid-metacarpal level in adult patients from 2007 to 2017 was performed. Data on patient demographics, mechanism and level of injury, veins repaired, iatrogenic bleeding, postoperative transfusions, and replant survival were obtained. Results: There were a total of 54 single-digit replants. The most common mechanism was lacerations (N = 38), and the most common injury level was at the proximal phalanx (N = 21). All digits were replanted with a single arterial anastomosis—44% via grafting. In all, 0 to 3 veins were repaired per digit (mean = 1.5 veins). The mean transfusion requirement was 1.7 units. The survival rate was 50%. Digits with 1 or 2 veins repaired had lower transfusion requirements (1.1-1.3 units) and higher survival rates (56%-61%) compared with those replanted with 0 or 3 veins repaired (2.9-3.5 transfused units, 25%-29% survival). There were no differences between those digits replanted with either 1 or 2 veins repaired for transfusion requirements or survival. Conclusions: More veins repaired do not necessarily improve survival or possibly venous outflow, calling into question the traditional teaching that 2 veins should be repaired for every arterial anastomosis.
机译:背景:一般教学是,数字补充剂中的静脉维修数量增加导致改善静脉流出,导致高处理性出血,降低术后输血要求和更好的存活率。本研究的目的是确定强调每动脉吻合术治疗多个静脉的传统教学是否导致卓越的存活率。方法:对2007至2017年成年患者中期核糖水平的单一城市复制中心的单位数饮品的回顾性审查进行了回顾性。获得患者人口统计,机制和损伤机制和水平的数据,得到修复的静脉,术重出血,术后输血和复产生存期。结果:共有54个单位上的Replants。最常见的机制是撕裂(n = 38),并且最常见的损伤水平位于近端苯甲烷(n = 21)。通过嫁接以单个动脉吻合术 - 44%重新包装所有数字。总而,每位0至3个静脉修复(平均= 1.5静脉)。平均输血要求为1.7个单位。存活率为50%。修复1或2个静脉的数字较低的输血要求(1.1-1-1.3单位)和较高的存活率(56%-61%)与0或3个静脉修复的那些(2.9-3.5分类单位,25%-29%生存)。随着1或2个静脉修复的那些数字之间没有用于输血要求或存活之间没有差异。结论:更多的静脉修复不一定改善生存或可能的静脉流出,调用问题,传统教学,即2静脉应对每个动脉吻合术修复。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号