...
首页> 外文期刊>World Journal of Surgical Oncology >The application of fibular free flap with flexor hallucis longus in maxilla or mandible extensive defect: a comparison study with conventional flap
【24h】

The application of fibular free flap with flexor hallucis longus in maxilla or mandible extensive defect: a comparison study with conventional flap

机译:腓骨vallucis kongus在颌骨或下颌骨广泛缺陷中的应用:传统皮瓣的比较研究

获取原文
           

摘要

The repair and reconstruction of maxillary and mandibular extensive defects have put huge challenges to surgeons. The fibular free flap (FFF) is one of the standard treatment choices for reconstruction. The conventional FFF has deficiencies, such as forming poor oral mucosa, limited flap tissue, and perforator vessel variation. To improve the use of FFF, we add the flexor hallucis longus (FHL) in the flap (FHL-FFF). In this paper, we described the advantage and indication of FHL-FFF and conducted a retrospective study to compare FHL-FFF and FFF without FHL. Fifty-four patients who underwent FFF were enrolled and divided into two groups: nFHL group (using FFF without FHL, 38 patients) and FHL group (using FHL-FFF, 16 patients). The perioperative clinical data of patients was collected and analyzed. The flaps all survived in two groups. We mainly used FHL to fill dead space, and the donor-site morbidity was slight. In FHL group, flap harvesting time was shorter (118.63?±?11.76 vs 125.74?±?11.33?min, P?=?0.042), the size of flap’s skin paddle was smaller (16.5 (0–96) vs 21.0(10–104) cm2, P?=?0.027) than nFHL group. There were no significant differences (P?>?0.05) in hospital days, hospitalization expense, rate of perioperative complications, etc. between the two groups. Compared with FFF without FHL, FHL-FFF will neither affect the use of flap nor bring more problems. The FHL-FFF simplifies the flap harvesting operation. The FHL can form good mucosa and make FFF rely less on skin paddle. It can be used for adding flap tissue and dealing with perforator vessel variation in reconstruction of maxillary and mandibular extensive defects.
机译:颌骨和下颌大缺陷的修复和重建对外科医生产生了巨大挑战。腓像自由襟翼(FFF)是重建的标准处理选择之一。传统的FFF具有缺陷,例如形成差的口腔粘膜,有限的皮瓣组织和穿孔血管变化。为了改善FFF的使用,我们在襟翼(FHL-FFF)中添加了屈肌allucis longus(fhl)。在本文中,我们描述了FHL-FFF的优势和指示,并进行了回顾性研究以比较FHL-FFF和FFF而没有FHL。患有FFF的五十四名患者注册并分为两组:NFHL组(使用FFF而没有FHL,38名患者)和FHL组(使用FHL-FFF,16名患者)。收集和分析患者的围手术期临床数据。襟翼全部幸存下来。我们主要使用FHL来填补死区,捐赠者的发病率轻微。在FHL组中,襟翼收获时间较短(118.63?±11.76 Vs 125.74?±11.33〜min,p?= 0.042),襟翼的皮肤桨的尺寸较小(16.5(0-96)Vs 21.0(10) -104)cm2,p?= 0.027)比nfhl组。在两组之间,医院日,住院费用,住院费用,围手术期并发症等没有显着差异(p?> 0.05)。与没有FHL的FFF相比,FHL-FFF既不会影响襟翼的使用,也不会带来更多问题。 FHL-FFF简化了襟翼采集操作。 FHL可以形成良好的粘膜,使FFF少于皮肤桨。它可用于添加襟翼组织并处理穿孔血管变异,以重建上颌和下颌大规模缺陷。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号