首页> 外文期刊>World Journal of Surgical Oncology >The role of 18 F-FDG uptake features in the differential diagnosis of solitary pulmonary lesions with PET/CT
【24h】

The role of 18 F-FDG uptake features in the differential diagnosis of solitary pulmonary lesions with PET/CT

机译:18名F-FDG摄取特征在孤立性肺病变的鉴别诊断中的作用与PET / CT

获取原文
           

摘要

Background The aim of this study is to evaluate the value of 18 F-FDG uptake features in the diagnosis of solitary pulmonary lesions. Methods One hundred thirty-nine patients with solitary pulmonary lesions were divided into full uptake, circular uptake, multi-focus uptake, mild uptake, and no-uptake groups according to the uptake features of 18 F-FDG in solitary pulmonary lesions. The incidence of benign and malignant lesions and the false-positive and false-negative rates in each group were analyzed. The sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV) of the method using 18 F-FDG uptake features combined with maximum standard uptake value (SUVmax) (SUV method) in the differential diagnosis of solitary pulmonary lesions were evaluated. Results There were 89 malignant and 50 benign lesions. (1) The malignant incidence of the full uptake group was 84.0?% (63/75), and there were significant differences when compared with the other groups except the circular uptake group (16/23) (all P?=?0.0001). The benign incidence of the multi-focus and no-uptake groups was 83.3?% (10/12) and 82.4?% (14/17), respectively, and there were significant differences when compared with the full uptake and the circular uptake groups, respectively (all P?P?>?0.05). No statistical significance was found between either two of the no-uptake, mild uptake, and multi-focus uptake groups (all P?>?0.05). (2) In cases with SUVmax ≥2.5, the false-positive rate in the multi-focus uptake group was 83.3?% (10/12), which was significantly higher than in the full uptake (12/75) or circular uptake group (7/23) (all P?P?=?0.218). (3) The sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, PPV, and NPV of the method using 18 F-FDG uptake features combined with SUVmax and the single SUV method were 88.7?%/91.0?%, 62.0?%/42.0?%, 79.1?%/73.4?%, 80.6?%/73.6?%, and 75.6?%/72.4?%, respectively. Conclusions The method using uptake features of 18 F-FDG combined with SUVmax can improve the diagnostic specificity and accuracy of solitary pulmonary lesions. The multi-focus uptake feature maybe a benign sign, which still needs more researches to confirm.
机译:背景技术本研究的目的是评估孤立肺病变诊断中 18 f-fdg摄取特征的值。方法对孤立性肺病灶的一百三十九个患者分为满吸收,圆形摄取,多聚焦摄取,轻度摄取和无摄取组,根据 18 f-fdg的摄取特征在孤独的肺病变中。分析了良性和恶性病变的发病率和每组的假阳性和假阴性率。使用 18 f-fdg吸收特征与最大标准摄取值(suv方法)的方法的敏感性,特异性,精度,阳性预测值(PPV)和负预测值(NPV)(SUVMAX)(SUV方法) )在评价孤立性肺病变的差异诊断中。结果有89个恶性和50个良性病变。 (1)完全摄取组的恶性发病率为84.0?%(63/75),与除圆形摄取组(16/23)外的其他组相比,存在显着差异(所有p?= 0.0001) 。多重聚焦和No-Uptake组的良性发病率分别为83.3μm(10/12)和82.4%(14/17),与完整摄取和循环摄取组相比,存在显着差异分别(所有p?p?> 0.05)。在任何两种禁止摄取,轻度摄取和多重聚焦摄取组(所有P?> 0.05)之间没有发现统计学意义。 (2)在Suvmax≥2.5的情况下,多重聚焦摄取组的假阳性率为83.3?%(10/12),其显着高于完整摄取(12/75)或圆形摄取组(7/23)(所有p?p?= 0.218)。 (3)使用 18 f-fdg吸收特征的敏感性,特异性,精度,ppv和npv与suvmax组合的方法和单一SUV方法为88.7?%/ 91.0?%,62.0? %/ 42.0?%,79.1%/ 73.4〜7.%,80.6□%/ 73.6□分别,75.6〜%/ 72.4〜7.%。结论使用 18 f-fdg的使用摄取特征的方法可以提高孤立性肺病变的诊断特异性和准确性。多重焦点摄取功能可能是一个良性标志,仍然需要更多的研究来确认。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号