...
首页> 外文期刊>Western Journal of Emergency Medicine >Patient Age, Race and Emergency Department Treatment Area Associated with “Topbox” Press Ganey Scores
【24h】

Patient Age, Race and Emergency Department Treatment Area Associated with “Topbox” Press Ganey Scores

机译:与“TOPBOX”的患者年龄,种族和急诊部门治疗领域按GANEY分数

获取原文
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Introduction: Hospitals commonly use Press Ganey (PG) patient satisfaction surveys forbenchmarking physician performance. PG scores range from 1 to 5, with 5 being the highest,which is known as the “topbox” score. Our objective was to identify patient and physician factorsassociated with topbox PG scores in the emergency department (ED).Methods: We looked at PG surveys from January 2015–December 2017 at an academic, urbanhospital with 78,000 ED visits each year. Outcomes were topbox scores for the questions:“Likelihood of your recommending our ED to others”; and “Courtesy of the doctor.” We analyzedtopbox scores using generalized estimating equation models clustered by physician and adjustedfor patient and physician factors. Patient factors included age, gender, race, ethnicity, and ED areawhere patient was seen. The ED has four areas based on patient acuity: emergent; urgent; vertical(urgent but able to sit in a recliner rather than a gurney); and fast track (non-urgent). Physicianfactors included age, gender, race, ethnicity, and number of years at current institution.Results: We analyzed a total of 3,038 surveys. For “Likelihood of your recommending our ED toothers,” topbox scores were more likely with increasing patient age (odds ratio [OR] 1.07; 95%confidence interval [CI], 1.03-1.12); less likely among female compared to male patients (OR 0.81;95% CI, 0.70-0.93); less likely among Asian compared to White patients (OR 0.71; 95% CI, 0.60-0.83); and less likely in the urgent (OR 0.71; 95% CI, 0.54-0.93) and vertical areas (OR 0.71; 95% CI0.53-0.95) compared to fast track. For “Courtesy of the doctor,” topbox scores were more likely withincreasing patient age (OR 1.1; CI, 1.06-1.14); less likely among Asian (OR 0.70; 95% CI, 0.58-0.84),Black (OR 0.66; 95% CI ,0.45-0.96), and Hispanic patients (OR 0.68; 95% CI ,0.55-0.83) compared toWhite patients; and less likely in urgent area (OR 0.69; 95% CI ,0.50-0.95) compared to fast track.Conclusion: Increasing patient age was associated with increased likelihood of topbox scores,while Asian patients, and urgent and vertical areas had decreased likelihood of topbox scores. Weencourage hospitals that use PG topbox scores as financial incentives to understand the contributionof non-service factors to these scores.
机译:介绍:医院常用印刷机(PG)患者满意度调查营销医师表现。 PG得分范围为1到5,5是最高的,称为“顶箱”得分。我们的目标是将患者和医生在急诊部门(ED)中的顶级盒PG分数中分配的患者和医生.Methods:2017年1月至2017年1月 - 2017年12月的PG调查,每年有78,000次申请。结果是提出问题的顶端专家:“您向别人推荐的可能性”;和“由医生提供。”我们使用由医生聚集的广义估计公式模型进行分析ZEPBox分数,并调整患者和医师因素。患者因素包括年龄,性别,种族,种族和ED地区的患者。 ED有四个基于患者敏锐度的区域:紧急;紧迫的;垂直(迫切,但能够坐在躺椅上而不是Gurney);和快速轨道(非紧急)。物理因子包括年龄,性别,种族,种族,以及当前机构的年龄。结果:我们分析了3,038次调查。对于“推荐我们的Ed哄骗的可能性,”Topbox分数更可能增加患者年龄(赔率比[或] 1.07; 95%置信区间[CI],1.03-1.12);与男性患者相比,女性的可能性不太可能(或0.81; 95%CI,0.70-0.93);与白人患者相比,亚洲相比不太可能(或0.71; 95%CI,0.60-0.83);与快速轨道相比,紧急(或0.71; 95%CI,0.54-0.93)和垂直区域(或0.71; 95%CI0.53-0.95)的可能不太可能。对于“医生提供的礼貌”,TopBox评分更可能患者年龄(或1.1; CI,1.06-1.14);亚洲(或0.70; 95%CI,0.58-0.84),黑色(或0.66%CI,0.45-0.96)和西班牙裔患者(或0.68%; 95%CI,0.55-0.83)之间的可能性不太可能;与快速跟踪相比,紧急区域(或0.69; 95%CI,0.50-0.95)的可能性不太可能与快速轨道相比:结论:患者年龄的增加与泰箱得分的可能性增加有关,而亚洲患者和迫切和垂直区域则减少了可能性Topbox分数。 Weencourage医院使用PG Topbox分数作为财务激励,以了解非服务因素对这些分数的贡献。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号