...
首页> 外文期刊>Trials >Efficacy of extended infusion of β-lactam antibiotics for the treatment of febrile neutropenia in haematologic patients: protocol for a randomised, multicentre, open-label, superiority clinical trial (BEATLE)
【24h】

Efficacy of extended infusion of β-lactam antibiotics for the treatment of febrile neutropenia in haematologic patients: protocol for a randomised, multicentre, open-label, superiority clinical trial (BEATLE)

机译:β-内酰胺抗生素延长输注治疗发热性中性缺血性患者的疗效:随机,多期式,开放标签,优越性临床试验(BEATLE)的议定书

获取原文
           

摘要

BACKGROUND:Febrile neutropaenia (FN) is a very common complication in patients with haematological malignancies and is associated with considerable morbidity and mortality. Broad-spectrum antipseudomonal β-lactam antibiotics (BLA) are routinely used for the treatment of cancer patients with FN. However, the clinical efficacy of BLA may be diminished in these patients because they present with pathophysiological variations that compromise the pharmacokinetic (PK) parameters of these antibiotics. Optimised administration of BLA in prolonged infusions has demonstrated better clinical outcomes in critically ill patients. However, there is a paucity of data on the usefulness of this strategy in patients with FN. The aim of this study is to test the hypothesis that the administration of BLA would be clinically more effective by extended infusion (EI) than by intermittent infusion (II) in haematological patients with FN.METHODS:A randomised, multicentre, open-label, superiority clinical trial will be performed. Patients with haematological malignancies undergoing chemotherapy or haematopoietic stem-cell transplant and who have FN and receive empirical antibiotic therapy with cefepime, piperacillin-tazobactam or meropenem will be randomised (1:1) to receive the antibiotic by EI (during half the time of the dosing interval) in the study group, or by II (30?min) in the control group. The primary endpoint will be clinical efficacy, defined as defervescence without modifying the antibiotic treatment administered within the first 5?days of therapy. The primary endpoint will be analysed in the intention-to-treat population. The secondary endpoints will be pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) target achievement, bacteraemia clearance, decrease in C-reactive protein, overall (30-day) case-fatality rate, adverse events and development of a population PK model of the BLA studied.DISCUSSION:Data on the usefulness of BLA administration in patients with FN are scant. Only three clinical studies addressing this issue have been published thus far, with contradictory results. Moreover, these studies had some methodological flaws that limit the interpretation of their findings. If this randomised, multicentre, phase IV, open-label, superiority clinical trial validates the hypothesis that the administration of BLA is clinically more effective by EI than by II in haematological patients with FN, then the daily routine management of these high-risk patients could be changed to improve their outcomes.TRIAL REGISTRATION:European Clinical Trials Database: EudraCT 2018-001476-37. ClinicalTrials.gov, ID: NCT04233996.
机译:背景:发热中性橄榄质(FN)是血液恶性肿瘤患者的一种非常常见的并发症,与具有相当大的发病率和死亡率有关。广谱抗杀螨型β-内酰胺抗生素(BLA)经常用于治疗癌症患者FN患者。然而,BLA的临床疗效可能在这些患者中减少,因为它们存在于损害这些抗生素的药代动力学(PK)参数的病理生理学变化。在延长输注中优化的BLA施用已经表现出危重病患者的更好的临床结果。然而,缺乏对FN患者的这种策略的有用性数据。本研究的目的是测试BLA的给药在延长输注(EI)临床上更有效的假设,所述延长输注(EI)比在血液学患者中的间歇性输注(II)。方法:随机,多期,开放标签,将进行优越性临床试验。患有化疗或出血性干细胞移植的患有血液无法血清病毒,患有FN并获得头孢噻肟,哌啶-Tazobactam或梅洛尼姆的患者将被随机(1:1)通过EI接受抗生素(在一半的时间内在研究组中的计量间隔,对照组中的II(30?min)。主要终点将是临床疗效,定义为延迟,而不改变在前5.治疗中施用的抗生素治疗。将在意向治疗人口中分析主要终点。次要终点将是药代动力学/药效学(PK / PD)目标成就,菌血症清除,C-反应蛋白的降低,总体(30天)病例 - BLA的人口PK模型的不良事件和发展。探讨:FN患者的BLA管理有用性的数据是狭窄的。目前只有三项涉及这个问题的临床研究,矛盾的结果已经发布。此外,这些研究有一些方法论缺陷限制了对他们的研究结果的解释。如果这一随机,多期中心,第四阶段,开放标签,优势临床试验验证了BLA给药在肝脏临床上更有效的假设,这些高风险患者的日常常规管理均比II临床上更有效可以改变以改善他们的结果.Trial注册:欧洲临床试验数据库:eudract 2018-001476-37。 ClinicalTrials.gov,ID:NCT04233996。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号