首页> 外文期刊>Trials >Structured, proactive care coordination versus usual care for Improving Morbidity during Post-Acute Care Transitions for Sepsis (IMPACTS): a pragmatic, randomized controlled trial
【24h】

Structured, proactive care coordination versus usual care for Improving Morbidity during Post-Acute Care Transitions for Sepsis (IMPACTS): a pragmatic, randomized controlled trial

机译:结构化,主动护理协调与常规护理败血症后急性护理过渡期间的发病率(影响):务实,随机对照试验

获取原文
           

摘要

BACKGROUND:Hospital mortality for patients with sepsis has recently declined, but sepsis survivors still suffer from significant long-term mortality and morbidity. There are limited data that support effective strategies to address post-discharge management of patients hospitalized with sepsis.METHODS:The Improving Morbidity during Post-Acute Care Transitions for Sepsis (IMPACTS) study is a pragmatic, randomized controlled trial at three hospitals within a single healthcare delivery system comparing clinical outcomes between sepsis survivors who receive usual care versus care delivered through the Sepsis Transition and Recovery (STAR) program. The STAR program includes a centrally located nurse navigator using telephone counseling and electronic health record-based support to facilitate best-practice post-sepsis care strategies for patients during hospitalization and the 30?days after hospital discharge, including post-discharge review of medications, evaluation for new impairments or symptoms, monitoring existing comorbidities, and palliative care referral when appropriate. Adults admitted through the Emergency Department with suspected infection (i.e., antibiotics initiated, bacterial cultures drawn) and deemed, by previously developed risk-stratification models, high risk for readmission or death are included. Eligible patients are randomly allocated 1:1 to either Arm 1, usual care or Arm 2, STAR. Planned enrollment is 708 patients during a 6-month period. The primary outcome is the composite of all-cause hospital readmissions and mortality assessed 30?days post discharge. Secondary outcomes include 30- and 90-day hospital readmissions, mortality, emergency department visits, acute care-free days alive, and acute care and total costs.DISCUSSION:This pragmatic evaluation provides the most comprehensive assessment to date of a strategy to improve delivery of recommended post-sepsis care.TRIAL REGISTRATION:ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03865602. Registered retrospectively on 6 March 2019.
机译:背景:脓毒症患者的医院死亡率最近下降,但败血症幸存者仍然患有显着的长期死亡率和发病率。存在有限的数据,支持有效的策略,以解决与Sepsis住院的患者的出院后管理。方法:急性护理后期患者的发病率提高(影响)研究是一家单一的三家医院的务实,随机对照试验。医疗保健送货系统比较败血症幸存者之间的临床结果,通过败血症过渡和恢复(明星)计划提供通常护理与护理。星级计划包括一个集中位于基于电话咨询和电子健康纪录的护士导航员,以促进住院期间和30次出院后30次患者的最佳实践后脓毒症护理策略,包括释放药物后审查,在适当时评估新的障碍或症状,监测现有的合并症和姑息治疗转诊。通过急诊部录取的成年人具有疑似感染(即,引发抗生素,被绘制的细菌培养物)并被认为,通过先前发育的风险分层模型,包括进入或死亡的高风险。符合条件的患者随机分配1:1至ARM 1,通常护理或手臂2,星形。 6个月期间,计划报名为708名患者。主要结果是全原医院入院和死亡率的综合评估30?天后院后的后期。二次结果包括30次和90天的医院入院,死亡率,急诊部门访问,急性无保险日期,以及急性护理和总成本。讨论:这个务实评估为改善交付的战略日期提供最全面的评估推荐的后脓毒症护理.Trial注册:ClinicalTrials.gov,NCT03865602。 2019年3月6日回顾性注册。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号