首页> 外文期刊>Trials >S-amlodipine plus chlorthalidone vs. S-amlodipine plus telmisartan in hypertensive patients unresponsive to amlodipine monotherapy: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial
【24h】

S-amlodipine plus chlorthalidone vs. S-amlodipine plus telmisartan in hypertensive patients unresponsive to amlodipine monotherapy: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial

机译:S-Amlodipine加氯噻酮与S-Amlodipine加上S-amlodipine加入替斯坦替氏症患者对氨氯地平单药治疗的关注:用于随机对照试验的研究方案

获取原文
           

摘要

The efficacy of a combination of a calcium channel blocker (CCB) plus chlorthalidone (diuretic) versus a CCB plus an angiotensin receptor blocker (ARB) in patients not responding to CCB monotherapy has not been evaluated previously. We plan to compare the efficacy and safety of S-amlodipine (CCB) plus chlorthalidone versus S-amlodipine plus telmisartan (ARB) combinations among hypertension patients unresponsive to amlodipine monotherapy. This study is a prospective, randomized, double-blind, multicenter, parallel, non-inferiority phase 4 study. Hypertension patients who have been treated with amlodipine (5?mg) or S-amlodipine (2.5?mg) monotherapy for ≥2?weeks and whose mean diastolic blood pressure (DBP) is greater than 90?mmHg will be randomized to either S-amlodipine (2.5?mg) plus chlorthalidone (25?mg) or S-amlodipine (2.5?mg) plus telmisartan (40?mg) therapy. The primary efficacy endpoint is mean sitting DBP change after 12?weeks of treatment. The study objective is to prove the non-inferiority of the former combination (test drug) as compared to the latter one (control) with a non-inferiority margin of 3?mmHg in mean DBP change. The secondary endpoints are 6-week DBP change, 6- and 12-week sitting systolic BP (SBP) change, and the attainment of the target BP (SBP??140?mmHg or DBP??90?mmHg). Urine albumin, albumin/creatinine ratio (ACR), pulse wave velocity, central BP, 24-h ambulatory BP monitoring, and body fluid composition analysis will be performed at each hospital's discretion. The sample size was estimated as 170 in total with 1:1 randomization. This is the first study comparing the efficacy of a CCB plus chlorthalidone versus a CCB plus an ARB in patients who are not responding to CCB single therapy. The study result will help clinicians to choose between chlorthalidone and telmisartan in CCB-unresponsive patients. ClinicalTrials.gov , NCT03226340. Registered on 2 December 2015.
机译:尚未评估钙通道阻断剂(CCB)加氯化物(利尿)与CCB加上CCB加上血管紧张素受体阻滞剂(ARB)的组合尚未评估未响应CCB单疗法的患者的血管紧张素受体阻滞剂(ARB)。我们计划比较S-amlodipine(CCB)加氯化龙酮的疗效和安全性与S-Amlodipine Plus Zelmisartan(Arb)组合在没有反应氨氯莨菪碱单疗法的高血压患者中的组合。本研究是一项预期,随机,双盲,多中心,平行,非劣势期4研究。已用氨氯地平(5?Mg)或S-amlodipine(2.5×Mg)单药治疗的高血压患者≥2周,其平均舒张压(DBP)大于90Ω·mmHg将随机化为S-氨氯氨脒(2.5?Mg)加氯噻酮(25μg)或S-氨醛(2.5×Mg)加替米沙坦(40毫克)治疗。主要疗效终点是平均坐在DBP后12次治疗后的变化。研究目的是与后者(对照)相比,证明前一种组合(试验药物)的非较低性(对照)在平均DBP变化中具有3μmMHg的非较低余量。次要终点是6周的DBP变化,6-和12周坐下的收缩压BP(SBP)变化,并达到目标BP(SBP?<?140?MMHG或DBP?<?90?MMHG)。尿白蛋白,白蛋白/肌酐比(ACR),脉搏波速度,中央BP,24-H动态BP监测和体液成分分析将在每个医院的自由裁量权下进行。样品大小估计为170,总共1:1随机化。这是比较CCB加氯化龙酮与CCB的疗效进行比较的第一研究,该患者在没有响应CCB单疗法的患者中。该研究结果将有助于临床医生在CCB无响应患者中选择Chlorthalidone和Telmisartan。 ClinicalTrials.gov,NCT03226340。 2015年12月2日注册。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号