...
首页> 外文期刊>Therapeutic advances in urology. >Meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials that assess the efficacy of low-intensity shockwave therapy for the treatment of erectile dysfunction
【24h】

Meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials that assess the efficacy of low-intensity shockwave therapy for the treatment of erectile dysfunction

机译:可随机对照试验的荟萃分析,评估低强度冲击波治疗治疗勃起功能障碍的疗效

获取原文
           

摘要

Background: The aim of this study was to perform a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that evaluate the efficacy of low-intensity extracorporeal shock wave therapy (LiESWT) for the treatment of erectile dysfunction (ED). Materials and methods: A comprehensive search of PubMed, Medline, and Cochrane databases was performed from November 2005 to July 2018. RCTs evaluating efficacy of LiESWT in the treatment of ED were selected. The primary outcomes were the mean difference between treatment and sham patients in the International Index of Erectile Function-Erectile Function (IIEF-EF) domain score 1 month after treatment, and the mean change in IIEF-EF from baseline to 1?month post-treatment. The secondary analysis considered the percentage of men whose erectile hardness score (EHS) changed from 3 after treatment. All analyses used a random effects method to pool study-specific results. Results: A total of seven RCTs provided data for 607 patients. The mean IIEF-EF 1?month post-treatment ranged from 12.8 to 22.0 in the treatment group versus 8.17–16.43 in the sham group. The mean difference between the treatment and sham groups at the 1?month follow up was a statistically significant increase in IIEF-EF of 4.23 (p = 0.012). Overall, five of the seven trials provided data on the proportion of patients with baseline EHS 3 at 1?month post-treatment. The proportions ranged from 3.5 to 90% in the treatment group versus 0–9% in the sham group and the pooled relative risk of EHS improvement for the treated versus sham group was 6.63 (p?=?0.0095). No significant adverse events were reported. Conclusions: This is the first meta-analysis that evaluates RCTs exploring LiESWT as a treatment modality strictly for ED. This therapeutic strategy appears to be well tolerated with short-term benefits. However further studies exploring specific treatment regimens and long-term outcomes are needed.
机译:背景:本研究的目的是对随机对照试验(RCT)进行荟萃分析,该试验评估低强度体外冲击波治疗(LIESWT)治疗勃起功能障碍(ED)的疗效。材料和方法:从2005年11月到2018年7月,完成了对PubMed,Medline和Cochrane数据库的全面搜索。选择了leivewt治疗Ed治疗的RCT评估患有效果的RCT。主要结果是治疗和假患者在治疗后1个月的勃起函数勃起函数(IIEIE-EIEIE-EIEIE-EIEIE-EIE-EIEIE-EIEF-EIEG)域名的平均差异,以及从基线到1?月的IIEIE-EIEIE-EF的平均变化治疗。二次分析认为,在治疗后,勃起硬度得分(EHS)从3变化的人的百分比。所有分析都使用了随机效应方法来播放特定的结果。结果:共有七个RCT为607名患者提供数据。平均IIEIE-EF 1?月后的治疗后的治疗组在治疗组的12.8%至22.0之间,而假手术组织在8.17-16.43中。治疗和假组合在1?月后的均值差异在统计上显着增加4.23的IIEIE-EF(P = 0.012)。总体而言,七项试验中的五项提供了关于基线EHS 3患者的比例的数据在治疗后1个月。在治疗组的比例范围为3.5%至90%,在假组合中的0-9%,治疗与假目的EHS改善的汇集相对风险为6.63(p?= 0.0095)。没有报道任何明显的不良事件。结论:这是第一次评估RCTS探索Lieswt作为治疗方式的第一次荟萃分析。这种治疗策略似乎具有短期益处的耐受性。然而,需要进一步的研究探索具体治疗方案和长期结果。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号