首页> 外文期刊>The journal of headache and pain >Practical and clinical utility of non-invasive vagus nerve stimulation (nVNS) for the acute treatment of migraine: a post hoc analysis of the randomized, sham-controlled, double-blind PRESTO trial
【24h】

Practical and clinical utility of non-invasive vagus nerve stimulation (nVNS) for the acute treatment of migraine: a post hoc analysis of the randomized, sham-controlled, double-blind PRESTO trial

机译:非侵入性迷走神经刺激(NVNS)的实用和临床效用,用于偏头痛的急性治疗:随机,假控,双盲Presto试验的后HOC分析

获取原文
           

摘要

The PRESTO study of non-invasive vagus nerve stimulation (nVNS; gammaCore?) featured key primary and secondary end points recommended by the International Headache Society to provide Class I evidence that for patients with an episodic migraine, nVNS significantly increases the probability of having mild pain or being pain-free 2?h post stimulation. Here, we examined additional data from PRESTO to provide further insights into the practical utility of nVNS by evaluating its ability to consistently deliver clinically meaningful improvements in pain intensity while reducing the need for rescue medication. Patients recorded pain intensity for treated migraine attacks on a 4-point scale. Data were examined to compare nVNS and sham with regard to the percentage of patients who benefited by at least 1 point in pain intensity. We also assessed the percentage of attacks that required rescue medication and pain-free rates stratified by pain intensity at treatment initiation. A significantly higher percentage of patients who used acute nVNS treatment (n?=?120) vs sham (n?=?123) reported a?≥?1-point decrease in pain intensity at 30?min (nVNS, 32.2%; sham, 18.5%; P?=?0.020), 60?min (nVNS, 38.8%; sham, 24.0%; P?=?0.017), and 120?min (nVNS, 46.8%; sham, 26.2%; P?=?0.002) after the first attack. Similar significant results were seen when assessing the benefit in all attacks. The proportion of patients who did not require rescue medication was significantly higher with nVNS than with sham for the first attack (nVNS, 59.3%; sham, 41.9%; P?=?0.013) and all attacks (nVNS, 52.3%; sham, 37.3%; P?=?0.008). When initial pain intensity was mild, the percentage of patients with no pain after treatment was significantly higher with nVNS than with sham at 60?min (all attacks: nVNS, 37.0%; sham, 21.2%; P?=?0.025) and 120?min (first attack: nVNS, 50.0%; sham, 25.0%; P?=?0.018; all attacks: nVNS, 46.7%; sham, 30.1%; P?=?0.037). This post hoc analysis demonstrated that acute nVNS treatment quickly and consistently reduced pain intensity while decreasing rescue medication use. These clinical benefits provide guidance in the optimal use of nVNS in everyday practice, which can potentially reduce use of acute pharmacologic medications and their associated adverse events. ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT02686034 .
机译:非侵入性迷走神经刺激的presto研究(NVNS;伽士群系;)专业的主要初级和次要终点,由国际头痛社会提供课程,为患有巨型偏头痛的患者,NVN显着增加了轻度的可能性疼痛或无痛苦2?H后刺激。在这里,我们通过评估其在减少抢救服用的需要,以通过评估其持续提供临床意义的改善的能力,从PRESTO检查了PRESTO的额外数据,以便通过始终如一地提供临床有意义的改善,同时降低抢救药物的需要。患者记录了4分尺度对待偏头痛攻击的疼痛强度。研究了数据,以比较NVN和Sham关于受益于疼痛强度至少1点的患者的百分比。我们还评估了所需救助药物的攻击百分比和治疗开始时疼痛强度分层的止痛率。使用急性NVNS治疗的患者(N?= 120)vs的显着较高百分比(n?=Δ123)报告a?≥≤1点疼痛强度在30?min(nvns,32.2%;假,18.5%; p?= 0.020),60?min(nvns,38.8%;假,24.0%; p?0.017),120?min(nvns,46.8%;假,26.2%; p?=第一次攻击后0.002)。在评估所有攻击中的益处时,可以看到类似的显着结果。不需要救援药物的患者的比例与第一次发作(NVNS,59.3%;假,41.9%; p?0.013)和所有攻击(NVN,52.3%;假, 37.3%; p?= 0.008)。当初始疼痛强度温和时,治疗后没有疼痛的患者的百分比显着高于60?min(所有攻击:NVN,37.0%;假,21.2%; P?0.025)和120 ?分钟(第一次攻击:NVN,50.0%;假,25.0%; P?= 0.018;所有攻击:NVN,46.7%;假,30.1%; p?= 0.037)。该后HOC分析表明,急性NVNS治疗迅速且始终减少疼痛强度,同时降低救援药物使用。这些临床效益在日常做法中提供了NVN的最佳使用指导,这可能会减少急性药物药物的使用及其相关不良事件。 ClinicalTrials.gov标识符:NCT02686034。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号