首页> 外文期刊>The journal of headache and pain >Consistent effects of non-invasive vagus nerve stimulation (nVNS) for the acute treatment of migraine: additional findings from the randomized, sham-controlled, double-blind PRESTO trial
【24h】

Consistent effects of non-invasive vagus nerve stimulation (nVNS) for the acute treatment of migraine: additional findings from the randomized, sham-controlled, double-blind PRESTO trial

机译:非侵入性迷走神经刺激(NVNS)对偏头痛的急性治疗的一致效果:随机,假手术,双盲普雷斯托试验中的其他结果

获取原文
           

摘要

Non-invasive vagus nerve stimulation (nVNS) has been shown to be practical, safe, and well tolerated for treating primary headache disorders. The recent multicenter, randomized, double-blind, sham-controlled PRESTO trial provided Class I evidence that for patients with episodic migraine, nVNS significantly increases the probability of having mild pain or being pain-free 2?h post stimulation. We report additional pre-defined secondary and other end points from PRESTO that demonstrate the consistency and durability of nVNS efficacy across a broad range of outcomes. After a 4-week observation period, 248 patients with episodic migraine with/without aura were randomly assigned to acute treatment of migraine attacks with nVNS (n?=?122) or a sham device (n?=?126) during a double-blind period lasting 4?weeks (or until the patient had treated 5 attacks). All patients received nVNS therapy during the subsequent 4-week/5-attack open-label period. The intent-to-treat population consisted of 243 patients. The nVNS group (n?=?120) had a significantly greater percentage of attacks treated during the double-blind period that were pain-free at 60 (P?=?0.005) and 120?min (P?=?0.026) than the sham group (n?=?123) did. Similar results were seen for attacks with pain relief at 60 (P?=?0.025) and 120?min (P?=?0.018). For the first attack and all attacks, the nVNS group had significantly greater decreases (vs sham) in pain score from baseline to 60?min (P?=?0.029); the decrease was also significantly greater for nVNS at 120?min for the first attack (P?=?0.011). Results during the open-label period were consistent with those of the nVNS group during the double-blind period. The incidence of adverse events (AEs) and adverse device effects was low across all study periods, and no serious AEs occurred. These results further demonstrate that nVNS is an effective and reliable acute treatment for multiple migraine attacks, which can be used safely while preserving the patient’s option to use traditional acute medications as rescue therapy, possibly decreasing the risk of medication overuse. Together with its practicality and optimal tolerability profile, these findings suggest nVNS has value as a front-line option for acute treatment of migraine. ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT02686034 .
机译:未侵入性迷走神经刺激(NVNS)已被证明是实用的,安全的,并且可耐受,用于治疗原发性头痛障碍。最近的多中心,随机,双盲,假的审判提供了I类证据,即对于患有情节偏头痛的患者,NVN显着增加了轻度疼痛或无痛苦的疼痛的概率2?H后刺激。我们报告了来自Presto的其他预定义的次要和其他终点,证明了在广泛的结果中的NVNS功效的一致性和耐久性。经过4周的观察期后,248名患有/不含光子的偏头痛患者被随机分配给偏头痛与NVNS(n?=Δ122)或假装置(n?=Δ126)急性治疗急性治疗盲时期持续4?周(或直到患者治疗5次攻击)。所有患者在随后的4周/ 5次攻击开放标签期间接受NVNS治疗。意图治疗群体由243名患者组成。 NVNS组(n?=Δ10)在60(p?= 0.005)和120?min(p≤x0.026)上无疼痛的双盲时期治疗的攻击百分比显着更大百分比。(p?= 0.026)假小组(n?= 123)。在60(p?= 0.025)和120?min的疼痛缓解的攻击攻击,看到类似的结果是相似的(p?= 0.018)。对于第一次攻击和所有攻击,NVNS组从基线到60?min的疼痛评分中的减少(VS Sham)明显更大(Vs Sham)(p?= 0.029);对于第一次攻击的120?min,NVN的降低也明显更大(P?= 0.011)。在双盲期间,开放标签期间的结果与NVNS组的结果一致。在所有研究期间,不良事件(AES)和不良器件效应的发生率低,并且没有发生严重的AES。这些结果表明,NVNS是多种偏头痛攻击的有效且可靠的急性治疗,其可以安全地使用,同时保留患者使用传统急性药物作为救援治疗的选择,可能会降低药物过度使用的风险。这些发现与其实用性和最佳的耐受性概况相同,表明NVNS具有作为偏头痛急性治疗的前线选择。 ClinicalTrials.gov标识符:NCT02686034。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号