...
首页> 外文期刊>Pneumonia. >Treatment of community-onset pneumonia in neutropenic cancer patients: β-lactam monotherapy versus combination antibiotic regimens
【24h】

Treatment of community-onset pneumonia in neutropenic cancer patients: β-lactam monotherapy versus combination antibiotic regimens

机译:中性癌症患者社区发作肺炎的治疗:β-内酰胺单疗法与组合抗生素方案

获取原文

摘要

Although β-lactam monotherapy may be sufficient in non-critically ill patients with community-acquired pneumonia, the value of combination antibiotic regimens in community-onset neutropenic pneumonia remains unclear. A retrospective cohort study was conducted to compare the effects of combination antibiotic regimens to those of β-lactam monotherapy in cancer patients with community-onset neutropenic pneumonia. Electronic medical records of patients diagnosed with community-onset neutropenic pneumonia between March 1995 and February 2015 at a tertiary care center were reviewed. During the study period, 165 cancer patients with community-onset neutropenic pneumonia were identified. Seventy-two patients received β-lactam monotherapy and 93 received combination therapy (β-lactam plus either a macrolide or fluoroquinolone). Causative pathogens were identified in 27.9% of the patients, and only two were positive for atypical pathogens. Although 30-day mortality was higher in the β-lactam group (15.3% versus 4.3%; P?=?0.015), combination therapy was not associated with a statistically significant survival benefit in the multivariate analysis (hazard ratio 0.85, 95% confidence interval 0.20-3.67; P?=?0.827). Duration of neutropenia, C-reactive protein level, and Multinational Association for Supportive Care in Cancer risk index were significant factors for 30-day mortality. In a subgroup analysis of patients treated with cefepime, the most frequently used β-lactam (63.0%), combination therapy also showed no significant survival benefit. Combination antibiotic regimens were not associated with a survival benefit over β-lactam monotherapy in the treatment of community-onset neutropenic pneumonia. Unnecessary combination therapy should be reconsidered in cancer patients who are at high risk for adverse drug reactions and colonization with multi-drug resistant organisms.
机译:虽然β-内酰胺单疗法可能在非批评性肺炎患者中足够,但是社区发作中性肺炎中组合抗生素方案的价值仍不清楚。进行了回顾性队列研究以比较组合抗生素方案对癌症患者β-内酰胺单疗法的影响,患有社区发作的中性肺炎患者。审查了1995年3月至2015年3月间在第三段护理中心诊断患有社区出现中性肺炎的患者的电子病程。在研究期间,鉴定了165例患有社区发作中性肺炎的癌症患者。七十二名患者接受β-内酰胺单疗法和93种接受的组合治疗(β-内酰胺加仑,氟化物或氟代喹啉)。在27.9%的患者中鉴定了致病病原体,并且仅为非典型病原体仅为阳性。虽然β-内酰胺组30天死亡率较高(15.3%对4.3%; p?= 0.015),组合治疗与多变量分析中的统计学显着的存活益处无关(危险比0.85,95%的信心间隔0.20-3.67; p?= 0.827)。中性粒细胞减少症,C反应蛋白水平和跨国关联癌症风险指数的跨国协会是30天死亡率的重要因素。在用头孢肟治疗的患者的亚组分析中,最常用的β-内酰胺(63.0%),联合治疗也没有显着的生存效益。组合抗生素方案与β-内酰胺单疗法的生存益处无关,治疗社区发作的中性肺炎肺炎。应在癌症患者中重新考虑不必要的联合治疗,该癌症患者具有不良风险的不良药物反应和具有多种耐药生物的殖民化。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号