首页> 外文期刊>UFSM Curso de Direito. Revista Eletronica >PROTE??O DOS PARTICULARES E CENSURA PRIVADA: A JURISPRUDêNCIA CONSTITUCIONAL SOBRE OS LIMITES à LIBERDADE DE EXPRESS?O
【24h】

PROTE??O DOS PARTICULARES E CENSURA PRIVADA: A JURISPRUDêNCIA CONSTITUCIONAL SOBRE OS LIMITES à LIBERDADE DE EXPRESS?O

机译:保护私人个人和私人审查:宪法的判例限制言论自由?

获取原文
           

摘要

One of the basic principles of contemporary democracies is freedom of speech. The plurality of politics, religion and thought that marked the development of the West made the assertion of democracy as a rule coupled with the affirmation of some fundamental freedoms. However, freedom of speech is also relevant to contractual relationships. Both to identify the cases in which it applies, and to define its limits. After all, these limitations are usually seen as potential censorship. However, such a limitation is necessary because, like any fundamental right, freedom of speech cannot serve as a refuge for attitudes that violate other constitutionally foreseen interests. In this sense, the objective of this work is to analyze the jurisprudence of the Brazilian Supreme Court in considering the admissible limits to freedom of speech, seeking to identify the system used to apply this freedom to contractual relations. The research analyzed some emblematic cases judged from the promulgation of the Brazilian Constitution of 1988 through a bibliographical and dialectical methodology.
机译:当代民主国家的基本原则之一是言论自由。标志着西方发展的多个政治,宗教和思想使民主的主张成为了民主,因为这一规则加上了一些基本自由的肯定。但是,言论自由也与合同关系相关。既可识别它所适用的案例,并定义其限制。毕竟,这些限制通常被视为潜在的审查。然而,如此限制是必要的,因为就像任何基权一样,言论自由不能作为侵犯其他宪法预见的兴趣的态度的避难所。从这个意义上讲,这项工作的目标是分析巴西最高法院的判例,以便考虑致辞言论的可接受限制,寻求确定用于将这种自由应用于合同关系的系统。该研究分析了1988年1988年巴西宪法颁布的一些标志性病例,通过书目和辩证方法。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号