首页> 外文期刊>Udayana Journal of Law and Culture >Chthonic Legal Traditions: A Standpoint Legal Research Paradigm for Comparative Analysis on Australian Indigenous Legal Orders
【24h】

Chthonic Legal Traditions: A Standpoint Legal Research Paradigm for Comparative Analysis on Australian Indigenous Legal Orders

机译:追随者的法律传统:澳大利亚土着法定订单比较分析的一个角度法律研究范式

获取原文
           

摘要

In contemporary comparative legal scholarship, it is no longer controversial to assert the relevance of investigations into chthonic legal orders; however, there is a significant divergence on how they should be undertaken. The paper takes in consideration the Australian chthonic legal orders and argues that their investigations by non-Indigenous researchers need to be undertaken acknowledging an Indigenous epistemological approach to research, with methodological frameworks that, consistent with the principles of an Indigenous standpoint theory, aim to develop a legal standpoint research paradigm informed by Indigenous legal ontologies, epistemic theories and research practices. ?The research paradigm so elaborated is justified by the necessity of devising new epistemological models to guide understandings—and theoretical elaboration—of Australian Indigenous orders which are consistent and coherent with their ontological, epistemological and axiological universe.
机译:在当代比较法律奖学金中,不再争议调查调查进入核心法定订单的相关性;但是,如何对如何进行的差异分歧。本文考虑了澳大利亚核心法定命令,并认为他们的对非土着研究人员的调查需要承认致力于对研究的土着认识论方法,与土着角度理论的原则一致,旨在发展土着法律本体,认识性理论和研究实践的法律立场研究范式。 ?研究范式如此详细阐述是通过设计新的认识论模型来指导澳大利亚土着订单的理解和理论制作的必要性是合理的,这是与他们的本体论,认识论和公理宇宙一致和连贯的澳大利亚土着订单。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号