...
首页> 外文期刊>PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases >Comparison of multi-parallel qPCR and double-slide Kato-Katz for detection of soil-transmitted helminth infection among children in rural Bangladesh
【24h】

Comparison of multi-parallel qPCR and double-slide Kato-Katz for detection of soil-transmitted helminth infection among children in rural Bangladesh

机译:多平行QPCR检测孟加拉国儿童土壤传播蠕虫感染检测

获取原文
           

摘要

Soil-transmitted helminth infections (STH) (e.g., Ascaris, hookworm, Trichuris) contribute to a large burden of disease among children in low- and middle-income countries. There is increasing interest in implementing large-scale deworming programs to eliminate STH in certain settings. Efforts to monitor whether local elimination has occurred require sensitive diagnostic tests that will not miss positive cases. Kato-Katz, a microscopy-based diagnostic test, has commonly been used to identify STH eggs in stool, but in settings where infection intensity is low, this method frequently misses positive samples because it requires visual identification of small numbers of eggs, and hookworm eggs may degrade prior to visualization. Quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qPCR) is a molecular diagnostic method for detecting STH. It may detect more low intensity infections than Kato-Katz because it identifies STH DNA in stool; DNA can be detected in very small quantities and is less likely to degrade than STH ova. Thus, qPCR is likely to be more accurate than Kato-Katz. This study compared the performance of double-slide Kato-Katz and qPCR using 2,799 stool samples from children aged 212 years in a setting in rural Bangladesh with predominantly low STH infection intensity. qPCR was more sensitive than Kato-Katz for hookworm and Trichuris infections. 26% of samples were classified as Ascaris positive by Kato-Katz and negative by qPCR. DNA sequencing of 10 samples confirmed that Ascaris was absent in samples classified as positive by Kato-Katz and negative by qPCR. We conclude that Kato-Katz likely produced false positive results for Ascaris and that qPCR had a higher sensitivity than double-slide Kato-Katz in this low infection intensity setting.
机译:土壤传播的蠕虫感染(STH)(例如,蛔虫,钩虫,Trichuris)有助于低收入和中等收入国家的儿童疾病的巨大负担。在实现大规模驱逐程序中,在某些环境中实现大规模驱逐程序的兴趣越来越兴趣。努力监测是否发生了局部消除需要敏感的诊断测试,不会错过积极案例。 Kato-Katz,一种基于显微镜的诊断测试,通常用于在粪便中识别STH鸡蛋,但在感染强度低的情况下,这种方法经常错过阳性样本,因为它需要视觉识别少量鸡蛋和钩虫在可视化之前,鸡蛋可能会降解。定量聚合酶链反应(QPCR)是检测STH的分子诊断方法。它可能检测到比kato-katz更低的强度感染,因为它识别粪便中的sth dna; DNA可以以非常小的量检测,并且不太可能比STH ova降低。因此,QPCR可能比Kato-Katz更准确。本研究比较了双级甲基-Katz和QPCR的性能,使用2,799岁的孟加拉国农村儿童的2,799岁的儿童样本,主要是低于STH感染强度。 QPCR比Kato-Katz更敏感,适用于钩虫和Trichuris感染。将26%的样品分类为ascaris阳性的Kato-katz和QPCR阴性。 10个样品的DNA测序证实,在样品中不存在蛔虫,该样品被Kato-Katz阳性和QPCR阴性。我们得出结论,Kato-Katz可能对Ascaris产生了假阳性结果,并且在这种低感染强度设定中,QPCR比双骤滑皮卡茨更高的灵敏度。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号