...
首页> 外文期刊>Pharmacy Practice >Differences between pharmacists’ perception of counseling and practice in the era of prescription drug misuse
【24h】

Differences between pharmacists’ perception of counseling and practice in the era of prescription drug misuse

机译:药剂师对处方药滥用时代咨询与实践的看法之间的差异

获取原文
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Objective: This study was conducted to assess pharmacists’ practices when counseling patients on their prescription medications, and their preferences for training. Methods: Five focus group discussions of community pharmacists (n=45, with seven to eleven participants in each group) were conducted in a major metropolitan city in the southern United States. Participants were recruited via email using a list of community pharmacists provided by the Texas State Board of Pharmacy. All focus group discussions were structured using a moderator guide consisting of both discrete and open-ended questions. Qualitative analysis software was used to analyze the data with a thematic analysis approach. Results: The participants in this study had a high self-efficacy regarding their ability to counsel on both new and opioid prescriptions. Many pharmacists experienced the same barriers to counseling and agreed on the components o counseling. However, the themes that emerged showed that the participants exhibited only a partial understanding of the components of counseling. The themes that emerged in the thematic analysis were perceived confidence and discordant counseling practices, inadequate infrastructure, lack of comprehensive counseling, inconsistent use of the Prescription Drug Monitoring Program (PDMP), and pharmacists’ desired training/assistance. Conclusions: Community pharmacists are in a unique position to help combat the opioid crisis; however, there has been very little research on the pharmacist-patient interaction in this context. With policy changes, such as the PDMP mandate, going into effect across the country, it is important to capitalize on the potential community pharmacists have in ameliorating the opioid crisis in the United States.
机译:目的:该研究进行了评估药剂师在处方药物咨询患者时的做法,以及他们对培训的偏好。方法:在美国南部大都会城市进行了五名社区药剂师(N = 45,每组的七个参与者)的五个焦点集团讨论。参与者通过电子邮件招募了由德克萨斯州药房提供的社区药剂师名单。所有焦点组讨论都是使用由离散和开放式问题组成的主持人指南来构建的。定性分析软件用于分析具有主题分析方法的数据。结果:本研究中的参与者对他们在新的和阿片类药物处方律师咨询的能力具有很高的自我效能。许多药剂师经历了相同的咨询障碍,并同意组成部分辅导。然而,出现的主题表明,参与者只是对咨询组成部分的部分了解。主题分析中出现的主题是感知信任和不和谐的咨询实践,基础设施不足,缺乏全面咨询,不一致使用处方药监测计划(PDMP)和药剂师所需的培训/援助。结论:社区药剂师处于独特的地位,以帮助打击阿片类药物危机;然而,在这种背景下对药剂师患者的相互作用几乎没有研究。通过政策变化,如PDMP授权,在全国范围内生效,重要的是利用潜在的社区药剂师在改善美国的危机方面很重要。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号