首页> 外文期刊>Pain Physician >Comparative Study of Chronic Postischemic Pain Models in Mice: O-Ring Versus Tie Method
【24h】

Comparative Study of Chronic Postischemic Pain Models in Mice: O-Ring Versus Tie Method

机译:小鼠慢性外阴疼痛模型的比较研究:O形环与绑定方法

获取原文
           

摘要

Background: The success rate for the production of animal models of chronic postischemia pain(CPIP) using an O-ring has yet to be improved in the study of complex regional pain syndrome-typeI (CRPS-I), and producing a CPIP model is challenging, especially for mice.Objectives: We devised a new CPIP model with a higher success rate that induces ischemia for 3hours by tying the hind limbs of mice with a rubber band, followed by reperfusion.Study Design: A randomized, controlled animal trial.Methods: Twenty-two male C57BL/6 mice were divided into a sham (n = 6), a ring (n = 8), anda tie group (n = 8). Anesthesia was induced using isoflurane. A precut O-ring was mounted onthe upper left ankle in the sham group. A tight-fitting O-ring and a push-pull gauge manometerwere mounted at the same location in the ring and tie groups, respectively. Reperfusion wasinduced 3 hours later. The thickness and circumference of the hind paws were measured beforeischemia induction. Measurements were repeated 10 days after reperfusion. Mechanical allodyniawas measured with a von Frey filament until 12 weeks after reperfusion.Results: The new tie model required 5 additional days until the onset of allodynia compared withthe existing CPIP O-ring model. However, the successful induction rate of CPIP was higher in thetie group than in the ring group, and allodynia was maintained for over 30 days in the tie group.The ring and tie groups exhibited significantly high levels of tumor necrosis factor-alpha than thosein the sham group.Limitations: First, we did not evaluate hyperalgesia, cold or heat allodynia. Second, we did notmeasure blood levels of inflammatory or antiinflammatory cytokines, and research on oxidativestress biomarkers such as isoprostane, 8-hydroxy-2’-deoxyguanosine (a marker of DNA oxidativedamage), and malondialdehyde was not performed.Conclusions: The new CPIP tie model has a higher rate of successful induction than existingO-ring models for mice, with longer duration of mechanical allodynia. The model may reduce thenumber of animals sacrificed in CRPS-I research and could be useful for studying long-term effectsof drugs.
机译:背景:在复杂的区域疼痛综合征 - Typei(CRPS-I)的研究中,使用O形圈的慢性遗产疼痛(CPIP)生产动物模型的成功率尚未得到改善,并产生CPIP模型挑战,特别是对小鼠的影响:我们设计了一种新的CPIP模型,通过用橡皮筋与橡皮筋绑定小鼠的后肢,诱导3小时的成功率更高的成功率,然后进行再灌注。研究:随机设计:随机的,受控动物试验。方法:将二十二个雄性C57BL / 6小鼠分成假(n = 6),环(n = 8),ANDA组(n = 8)。使用异氟醚诱导麻醉。预先安装的O形圈安装在假手中的左上角脚踝上。一个紧密的O形环和安装在环和系群相同位置的推挽表卷材。再灌注3小时后磨削。后爪的厚度和周长被测量去溶液诱导。再灌注后10天重复测量。用von frey灯丝测量的机械异常,直到再灌注后12周。结果:新的绑架模型需要5天,直到同种口育群体的发作与现有的CPIP O形圈模型相比。然而,Thetie组的CPIP的成功诱导率高于环组,并且在TIE组中保持异常30多天。环和系列表现出显着高水平的肿瘤坏死因子-α-α假Group.Limitations:首先,我们没有评估痛觉过敏,冷或热异常。其次,我们确实没有测量炎症或抗炎细胞因子的血液水平,并对氧化醛生物标志物如异前列烷,8-羟基-2'-脱氧核苷酸(DNA氧化率的标志物)和丙二醛进行研究。结论:新的CPIP领带模型比小鼠的现有环模型具有更高的成功诱导率,具有较长的机械异常疼痛。该模型可以减少在CRPS-I研究中处死的动物的DHOMBER,并且可用于研究药物的长期影响。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号