...
首页> 外文期刊>Pain research & management: the journal of the Canadian Pain Society = journal de la socie?te? canadienne pour le traitement de la douleur >Perceptions and Impact of the 2017 Canadian Guideline for Opioid Therapy and Chronic Noncancer Pain: A Cross-Sectional Study of Canadian Physicians
【24h】

Perceptions and Impact of the 2017 Canadian Guideline for Opioid Therapy and Chronic Noncancer Pain: A Cross-Sectional Study of Canadian Physicians

机译:2017年阿片类药物治疗和慢性非癌症痛痛的感知和影响:加拿大医师的横截面研究

获取原文
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Background . Physician adherence to guideline recommendations for the use of opioids to manage chronic pain is often limited. Objective . In February 2018, we administered a 28-item online survey to explore perceptions of the 2017 Canadian guideline for opioid therapy and chronic noncancer pain and if physicians had altered practices in response to recommendations. Results . We invited 34,322 Canadian physicians to complete our survey, and 1,128 responded for a response rate of 3%; 687 respondents indicated they prescribed opioids for noncancer pain and answered survey questions about the guideline and their practice. Almost all were aware of the guideline, 94% had read the document, and 89% endorsed the clarity as good or excellent. The majority (86%) felt the guideline was feasible to implement, but 66% highlighted resistance by patients, and 63% the lack of access to effective nonopioid treatment as barriers. Thirty-six percent of respondents mistakenly believed the guideline recommended mandatory tapering for patients using high-dose opioid therapy (≥90?mg morphine equivalent per day), and 58% felt they would benefit from support for opioid tapering. Seventy percent of respondents had changed practices to align with guideline recommendations, with 51% engaging some high-dose patients in opioid tapering and 43% reducing the number of new opioid starts. Conclusion . There was high awareness of the 2017 Canadian opioid guideline among respondents, and preliminary evidence that recommendations have changed practice to better align with the evidence. Ongoing education is required to avoid the misunderstanding that opioid tapering is mandatory, and research to identify effective strategies to manage chronic noncancer pain is urgently needed.
机译:背景 。医师遵守指南用于使用阿片类药物来管理慢性疼痛的建议经常有限。客观的 。 2018年2月,我们管理了一项28件在线调查,探讨了对2017年的阿片类药物治疗和慢性非癌症痛痛的看法,以及医生因建议而改变了做法。结果 。我们邀请了34,3222名加拿大医生完成了我们的调查,1,128次回复3%的响应率; 687名受访者表明,他们为非癌症痛痛的表阿片类药物进行了答案,并回答了关于指南的调查问题及其实践。几乎所有人都知道指南,94%已读过该文件,89%认可的清晰度是好的或优秀的。大多数(86%)认为,实施指南是可行的,但患者的耐受耐受性66%,缺乏有效的非磷酸治疗作为障碍的63%。 36六个受访者错误地认为,指南推荐用于使用高剂量阿片类药物治疗的患者的强制性锥形(≥90?Mg吗啡每天等当量),58%的人认为他们将受益于对阿片类药物逐渐变化的支持。百分之七十的受访者已经改变了与指导建议对齐的做法,51%从事阿片类药物逐渐变细胞的一些高剂量患者,43%减少新阿片类药物的数量开始。结论 。对受访者之间的2017年加拿大阿片类药物指南有很高的认识,并初步证据表明建议改变了做出更好地与证据对齐。需要持续的教育来避免误解,即令人强迫的表阿片类逐渐变细,并迫切需要研究以确定管理慢性非癌症疼痛的有效策略。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号