首页> 外文期刊>Sustainability >Assessing the Level of Inter-Sectoral Policy Integration for Governance in the Water–Energy Nexus: A Comparative Study of Los Angeles and Beijing
【24h】

Assessing the Level of Inter-Sectoral Policy Integration for Governance in the Water–Energy Nexus: A Comparative Study of Los Angeles and Beijing

机译:评估水能Nexus治理的部门间政策整合水平:洛杉矶和北京的比较研究

获取原文
           

摘要

As concerns around water scarcity and energy security increase, so too has interest in the connections between these resources, through a concept called the water–energy nexus. Efforts to improve the integration of water and energy management and to understand their cross-sector relevance are growing. In particular, this paper develops a better empirical understanding on the extent to which governance settings hinder and/or enable policy coherence between the water and energy sectors through a comparative analysis of two case studies, namely, Los Angeles County, California, the United States, and the city of Beijing, China. This paper examines the extent to which the institutional context enables policy coordination within (vertically) and between (horizontally) the water and energy sectors in Beijing and Los Angeles. To do so, we propose a framework for analyzing policy integration for the water energy nexus based on environmental policy integration (EPI). The results highlight the multiple and flexible approaches of EPI in nexus governance, not least with regards to horizontal and vertical policy integration, but also in terms of explicit (i.e., intended) and implicit (i.e., unintended) coordination. The level of nexus-focused policy integration is highly dependent on the motivation at the local context and the criteria to evaluate policy success in each sector.
机译:随着水资源稀缺和能源安全的担忧,通过称为水能Nexus的概念,对这些资源之间的联系感到兴趣。改善水和能源管理融合和了解其跨部门相关性的努力正在增长。特别是,本文通过对两种案例研究的比较分析,对水和能源部门之间的程度提出了更好的经验理解,即通过两种案例研究,即洛杉矶县,加利福尼亚州,美国加利福尼亚州以及中国北京市。本文介绍了机构背景能够在北京和洛杉矶的水和能源部门之间和(水平)在(垂直)内部和(水平)之间的程度。为此,我们提出了一个框架,用于分析基于环境政策整合(EPI)的水能Nexus的政策整合。结果突出了Nexus治理的多种和灵活的ePI方法,尤其是关于水平和垂直策略集成,而且还在明确(即,预期)和隐式(即,无意)协调方面。重点关注的政策整合水平高度依赖于本地背景下的动机和评估每个部门在每个部门的政策成功的标准。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号