首页> 外文期刊>Singapore medical journal >Acute coronary syndrome in the elderly: the Malaysian National Cardiovascular Disease Database-Acute Coronary Syndrome registry
【24h】

Acute coronary syndrome in the elderly: the Malaysian National Cardiovascular Disease Database-Acute Coronary Syndrome registry

机译:老年人急性冠状动脉综合征:马来西亚全国心血管疾病数据库 - 急性冠状动脉综合征注册表

获取原文
           

摘要

INTRODUCTION The elderly are often underrepresented in clinical trials for acute coronary syndrome (ACS), and cardiologists commonly face management dilemmas in the choice of treatment for this group of patients, particularly concerning the use of invasive revascularisation. This study analysed the characteristics of hospitalised elderly patients with ACS, and compared the outcomes of treatments. METHODS From 29 December 2005 to 26 April 2010, 13,545 patients were admitted for ACS in 16 hospitals across Malaysia. These patients were divided into two groups – elderly (≥ 65 years) and non-elderly ( RESULTS Elderly patients had a higher cardiovascular risk burden and a higher incidence of comorbidities. They were less likely to receive urgent revascularisation for acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (elderly: 73.9% vs. non-elderly: 81.4%) and had longer door-to-needle time (elderly: 60 minutes vs. non-elderly: 50 minutes, p = 0.004). The rate of cardiac catheterisation was significantly lower in the elderly group across all ACS strata. Elderly patients had poorer outcomes than non-elderly patients, but those who received invasive treatment appeared to have better outcomes than those who received non-invasive treatment. CONCLUSION Elderly patients with ACS tend to be undertreated, both invasively and pharmacologically. Invasive treatment seems to yield better outcomes for this group of patients.
机译:引言,老年人常常在急性冠状动脉综合征(ACS)的临床试验中经常出现,并且心脏病学家在选择该组患者的治疗方面常见的面部管理困境,特别是在使用侵袭性血运血症。本研究分析了住院治疗ACS患者的特点,并比较治疗结果。方法从2005年12月29日至2010年4月26日,在马来西亚跨越16家医院的ACS录取13,545名患者。这些患者分为两组 - 老年人(≥65岁)和非老年人(结果老年患者具有更高的心血管风险负担和较高的合并症发病率。它们不太可能接受急性ST段抬高心肌急性血运重建症梗塞(老年人:73.9%Vs.非老年人:81.4%),门对针刺时间更长(老年人:60分钟与非老年人:50分钟,P = 0.004)。心脏导管率显着显着在所有ACS地层的老年人中较低。老年患者的成果比非老年患者更差,但那些接受侵袭性治疗的人似乎比接受非侵入性治疗的人更好的结果。结论患有ACS的老年患者往往被治疗,既有侵蚀性和药理学。侵袭性治疗似乎为这群患者产生了更好的结果。

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号