...
首页> 外文期刊>Silva Fennica >Re-calibrating stem volume models – is there change in the tree trunk form from the 1970s to the 2010s in Finland?
【24h】

Re-calibrating stem volume models – is there change in the tree trunk form from the 1970s to the 2010s in Finland?

机译:重新校准阀杆卷模型 - 从20世纪70年代到2010年的树干形式有变化吗?

获取原文

摘要

The tree stem volume models of Norway spruce, Scots pine and silver and downy birch currently used in Finland are based on data collected during 1968–1972. These models include four different formulations of a volume model, with three different combinations of independent variables: 1) diameter at height of 1.3 m above ground (dbh), 2) dbh and tree height (h) and 3) dbh, h and upper diameter at height of 6 m (d6). In recent National Forest Inventories of Finland, a difference in the mean volume prediction between the models with and without the upper diameter as predictor has been observed. To analyze the causes of this difference, terrestrial laser scanning (TLS) was used to acquire a large dataset in Finland during 2017–2018. Field-measured predictors and volumes predicted using spline functions fitted to the TLS data were used to re-calibrate the current volume models. The trunk form is different in these two datasets. The form height is larger in the new data for all diameter classes, which indicates that the tree trunks are more slender than they used to be. One probable reason for this change is the increase in stand densities, which is at least partly due to changed forest management. In models with both dbh and h as predictors, the volume is smaller a given h class in the data new data than in the old data, and vice versa for the diameter classes. The differences between the old and new models were largest with pine and smallest with birch.
机译:目前在芬兰使用的挪威云杉,苏格兰松树和银和柔软桦树的树干体积模型基于1968年至1972年收集的数据。这些模型包括四种不同的体积模型配方,具有三种不同的独立变量组合:1)高度为1.3米(DBH),2)DBH和树高(H)和3)DBH,H和上部直径为6米(D6)。在芬兰近期国家森林清单中,已经观察到具有较高直径作为预测器的模型之间的平均体积预测的差异。为了分析这种差异的原因,陆地激光扫描(TLS)用于在2017 - 2018年期间在芬兰获取大型数据集。使用装配到TLS数据的样条函数预测的现场测量的预测器和卷来重新校准当前的容积模型。该两个数据集中的中继形式不同。所有直径类的新数据中的形式高度更大,这表明树干比以前更纤细。这种变化的一个可能的原因是站立密度的增加,这至少部分是由于森林管理变化的影响。在具有DBH和H的模型中作为预测器,该体积较小,在数据新数据中给定的H类比旧数据中的给定H类,反之亦然。旧型号与新型号之间的差异最大,桦木和最小的桦树。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号