...
首页> 外文期刊>SAGE Open >Latent Structure of Executive Functioning/Learning Tasks in the CogState Computerized Battery
【24h】

Latent Structure of Executive Functioning/Learning Tasks in the CogState Computerized Battery

机译:CogState计算机化电池中执行功能/学习任务的潜在结构

获取原文
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

This study tested whether executive functioning (EF)/learning tasks from the CogState computerized test battery show a unitary latent structure. This information is important for the construction of composite measures on these tasks for applied research purposes. Based on earlier factor analytic research, we identified five CogState tasks that have been labeled as EF/learning tasks and examined their intercorrelations in a new sample of Finnish birth cohort mothers (N = 233). Using confirmatory factor analyses, we compared two single-factor EF/learning models. The first model included the recommended summative scores for each task. The second model exchanged summative scores for first test round results for the three tasks providing these data, as initial task performance is expected to load more heavily on EF. A single-factor solution provided a good fit for the present five EF/learning tasks. The second model, which was hypothesized to tap more onto EF, had slightly better fit indices, χ2(5) = 1.37, p = .93, standardized root mean square residual (SRMR) = .02, root mean square error of approximation (RMSEA) = .00, 90% CI = [.00–.03], comparative fit index (CFI) = 1.00, and more even factor loadings (.30–.56) than the first model, χ2(5) = 4.56, p = .47, SRMR = .03, RMSEA = .00, 90% CI = [.00–.09], CFI = 1.00, factor loadings (.20–.74), which was hypothesized to tap more onto learning. We conclude that the present CogState sum scores can be used for studying EF/learning in healthy adult samples, but call for further research to validate these sum scores against other EF tests.
机译:本研究检测了CogState计算机化测试电池的高管运作(EF)/学习任务是否显示了单一的潜在结构。这些信息对于对应用研究目的的这些任务构建综合措施非常重要。基于早期的因素分析研究,我们确定了五个被标记为EF /学习任务的辅助任务,并在芬兰出生队母亲的新样本中审查了他们的同期(n = 233)。使用确认因素分析,我们比较了两个单因素EF /学习模型。第一个模型包括每个任务的建议的总结分数。第二种模型为第一次测试圆形结果交换了总结分数,为提供这些数据的三个任务,因为初始任务性能预计将在EF上加载更多。单因素解决方案提供了适合目前五个EF /学习任务的合适。被假设以挖掘更多到EF的第二模型具有稍微更好的拟合指数,χ2(5)= 1.37,p = .93,标准化的螺旋均方残差(SRMR)= .02,近似的根均方误差( RMSEA)= .00,90%CI = [.00-.03],比较拟合指数(CFI)= 1.00,更均匀的因子负载(.30-.56),而不是第一个型号,χ2(5)= 4.56 ,p = .47,srmr = .03,rmsea = .00,90%ci = [.00-.09],cfi = 1.00,因子装载(.20-.74),这是假设的,以便更多地在学习。我们得出结论,目前的齿轮总和分数可用于在健康的成人样品中研究EF /学习,但呼吁进一步研究,以验证对其他EF测试的这些总和。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号