首页> 外文期刊>BMC Psychology >Monitoring neurocognitive functioning in childhood cancer survivors: evaluation of CogState computerized assessment and the Behavior Rating Inventory of Executive Function (BRIEF)
【24h】

Monitoring neurocognitive functioning in childhood cancer survivors: evaluation of CogState computerized assessment and the Behavior Rating Inventory of Executive Function (BRIEF)

机译:监测儿童癌症幸存者中的神经认知功能:Cogstate计算机化评估的评估以及执行功能的行为评级库存(简介)

获取原文
       

摘要

Many childhood cancer survivors develop neurocognitive impairment, negatively affecting education and psychosocial functioning. Recommended comprehensive neuropsychological testing can be time- and cost- intensive for both institutions and patients and their families. It is important to find quick and easily administered surveillance measures to identify those in need of evaluation. We evaluated, individually and in combination, the sensitivity and specificity of the 1) Behavior Rating Inventory of Executive Functioning-Metacognition Index (BRIEF-MCI), and 2) CogState Composite Index (computerized assessment of cognition) in identifying below grade-level performance on state-administered tests of reading and mathematics among childhood cancer survivors. The 45 participants (39% female) were a mean age of 7.1?±?4.4?years at diagnosis, 14.0?±?3.0 at evaluation, with a history of leukemia (58%), lymphoma (9%), central nervous system tumors (20%), and other tumors (13%). Impairment on the BRIEF-MCI was associated with low sensitivity (26% reading, 41% mathematics) but stronger specificity (88% reading, 96% mathematics). We found similar associations for the CogState Composite Index with sensitivity of 26% for reading and 29% for mathematics and specificity of 92% for both reading and mathematics. Combining the two measures did not improve sensitivity appreciably (47% reading, 59% mathematics) while reducing specificity (84% reading, 88% mathematics). While individuals identified from the BRIEF-MCI or CogState Composite would likely benefit from a full neuropsychological evaluation given the strong specificity, use of these measures as screening tools is limited. With poor sensitivity, they do not identify many patients with academic difficulties and in need of a full neuropsychological evaluation. Continued effort is required to find screening measures that have both strong sensitivity and specificity.
机译:许多儿童癌症幸存者发育神经认知障碍,对教育和心理社会功能负面影响。推荐的综合性神经心理学测试可能是机构和患者及其家庭的时间和成本。重要的是要快速轻松地管理监测措施,以确定需要评估的人。我们在识别低于等级水平性能方面,单独和组合,单独和组合,单独和组合,1)行为评级库存(简报-MCI)和2)CogState综合指数(关于认知的计算机化评估)儿童癌症幸存者中读取和数学的读取和数学测试。 45名参与者(39%的女性)是平均年龄为7.1?±4.4?4.4岁,在诊断时,评估为14.0?±3.0,具有白血病历史(58%),淋巴瘤(9%),中枢神经系统肿瘤(20%)和其他肿瘤(13%)。简要介绍-MCI的损伤与低灵敏度(读数26%,数学41%)有关,但特异性强(读数88%,数学96%)。我们发现型型综合指数的相似关系具有26%的敏感性,读取和数学的数学和特异性为29%,读取和数学都为92%。结合两种措施并没有显着提高敏感性(47%读数,59%的数学),同时减少特异性(84%读数,数学88%)。虽然鉴于强大的特异性,从简短的-MCI或肠胃糖蛋白综合综合鉴定的个体可能受益于全部神经心理学评估,但在筛选工具中使用这些措施是有限的。敏感性差,它们不确定许多学术困难的患者,需要全神经心理学评估。继续努力寻找具有强烈敏感性和特异性的筛查措施。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号