...
首页> 外文期刊>Orthopaedic Journal of Sports Medicine >Medial Meniscus Posterior Root Tear Treatment: A matched cohort comparison of non-operative management, partial meniscectomy and repair
【24h】

Medial Meniscus Posterior Root Tear Treatment: A matched cohort comparison of non-operative management, partial meniscectomy and repair

机译:内侧半月板后根撕裂治疗:匹配的队列比较非手术管理,部分裂缝和修复

获取原文

摘要

Objectives: Meniscal root disruption results in a loss of hoop strain resistance, increased articular cartilage contact pressure, and acceleration of degenerative changes. There is limited data comparing the outcomes of similarly matched patients with a medial meniscus posterior root tear treated with non-operative management, partial meniscectomy, or repair. The purpose of this study is to compare treatment failure, clinical outcome scores, and radiographic findings for a matched cohort of patients who underwent either non-operative management, partial meniscectomy, or transtibial pull-through repair for a medial meniscus posterior root tear (MMPRT). Our hypothesis is that patients who underwent meniscus root repair will have lower rates of progression to arthroplasty than patients who were treated with non-operative management or partial meniscectomy. Methods: Patients who underwent transtibial medial meniscus posterior horn root repair were matched by meniscus laterality, age, sex and K-L grades to patients treated non-operatively or with a partial meniscectomy. Progression to arthroplasty rates, IKDC and Tegner scores, and radiographic outcomes were analyzed between groups. Results: Forty-five patients were included in this study (15 non-operative, 15 partial meniscectomy, 15 root repair). Progression to arthroplasty demonstrated significant differences among treatment groups at a mean 74 months (non-operative 4/15, partial meniscectomy 9/15, meniscus repair 0/15, p=.0003). The meniscus root repair group had significantly less arthritic progression, as measured by change in K-L grade from pre-op to post-op (non-operative 1.0, partial mensicectomy 1.1, and meniscus repair 0.1, p=.001). Conclusion: Meniscus root repair leads to significantly less arthritis progression and subsequent knee arthroplasty compared to non-operative management and partial meniscectomy in a demographically matched cohort.
机译:目的:半月板根中断导致箍菌株的损失,随着退行性变化的加速度增加。数据比较了与非手术管理,部分凌光切除术或修复的类似匹配患者的类似匹配患者的结果。本研究的目的是比较治疗失败,临床结果评分和放射线摄影结果,为匹配的患者队伍进行非手术管理,部分裂缝切除或进行宁静的修复,用于内侧弯月面条根撕裂(MMPRT) )。我们的假设是,接受半月板修复的患者将比患有非手术管理或部分凌光切除术治疗的患者对关节成形术的进展率较低。方法:接受剧本内侧弯月面后角根修复的患者与肿瘤横向,年龄,性别和K-L等级匹配给非可操作地或部分半月切除术的患者。在组之间分析了对关节成形术率的进展,IKDC和TEGNER分数和射线照相结果。结果:本研究中包含四十五名患者(15名非手术,15个部分半月切除术,15根修复)。关节置换术的进展在平均74个月内展示了治疗组之间的显着差异(非手术4/15,部分半月切除术9/15,弯月面修复0/15,P = .0003)。弯月面条根系修复组显着较低的关节炎进展,通过从op预拷前的K-L级别的变化来测量(非手术1.0,部分mensecectomy 1.1,弯月面修复0.1,p = .001)。结论:与人群匹配的队列中的非手术管理和部分半月岩相比,弯月面条根系治疗导致关节炎进展和随后的膝关节形成术。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号