首页> 外文期刊>Orthopaedic Journal of Sports Medicine >Biomechanical Evaluation of Proximal Hamstring Repair: All-Suture Anchor Versus Titanium Suture Anchor
【24h】

Biomechanical Evaluation of Proximal Hamstring Repair: All-Suture Anchor Versus Titanium Suture Anchor

机译:近端腿筋修复的生物力学评价:全缝合锚与钛缝合锚

获取原文
       

摘要

Background: Proximal hamstring avulsions are severe tendon injuries and are commonly sports-related. Open and endoscopic techniques as well as different anchor configurations have already been described for proximal hamstring repair. Novel all-suture anchors have been developed to provide decreased bone loss during placement and reduced occupied bone volume when compared with titanium suture anchors. Hypothesis: Complete proximal hamstring avulsions repaired with all-suture anchors will demonstrate equal load to failure and comparable displacement under cyclic loading when compared with titanium suture anchors. Study Design: Controlled laboratory study. Methods: Complete proximal hamstring avulsions were created in 18 paired cadaveric specimens (mean ± SD age, 63.0 ± 10.4 years). Either all-suture anchors or titanium suture anchors were used for repair. Cyclic loading from 10 to 125 N at 1 Hz was performed for 1500 cycles with a material testing machine. Displacement was assessed along anterior and posterior aspects of the tendon repair with optical tracking. Specimens were loaded to failure at a rate of 120 mm/min. Displacement, load to failure, and repair construct stiffness were compared between matched pairs with the Wilcoxon signed-rank test. Correlations were determined by Spearman rho analysis. Results: The all-suture anchors showed significantly higher load-to-failure values when compared with the titanium anchor repairs (799.64 ± 257.1 vs 573.27 ± 89.9 N; P = .008). There was no significant difference in displacement between all-suture anchors and titanium suture anchors at the anterior aspect (6.60 ± 2.2 vs 5.49 ± 1.1 mm; P = .26) or posterior aspect (5.87 ± 2.08 vs 5.23 ± 1.37 mm; P = .678) of the repaired hamstring tendons. Conclusion: All-suture anchors demonstrated similar displacement and superior load to failure when compared with titanium suture anchors. Clinical Relevance: The results of this study suggest that all-suture anchors are an equivalent alternative to titanium suture anchors for proximal hamstring avulsion repair.
机译:背景:近端腿筋撕开是严重的肌腱伤害,通常是竞争相关的。已经描述了开放和内窥镜技术以及不同的锚固配置,用于近端腿筋修复。已经开发出新的全缝合锚,以在与钛缝合锚定相比时在放置和减少的骨骼体积期间提供降低的骨损失。假设:与全缝合锚固锚固锚固修复的完整近端腿筋牵引将在与钛缝合锚定相比时,循环加载下的失效和相当位移的平衡载荷。研究设计:受控实验室研究。方法:完成近端腿筋牵引,在18种成对的尸体标本(平均±SD AGE,63.0±10.4岁)中创建。 All-Suture锚或钛缝合线锚固用于修复。用材料试验机进行1500个循环,对10至125n的环状加载为1500次循环。沿着光学跟踪的前前部和后部评估位移。标本以120mm / min的速率加载到失效。比较匹配对与Wilcoxon签名 - 秩检验比较的位移,负荷,以及修复构建刚度。通过Spearman Rho分析确定相关性。结果:与钛锚固维修相比(799.64±257.1 vs 573.27±89.9 n; p = .008)相比,全缝合锚点显示出明显更高的负载失效值。前方面的全缝合锚和钛缝合锚之间的位移没有显着差异(6.60±2.2 Vs 5.49±1.1 mm; p = .26)或后方面(5.87±2.08 Vs 5.23±1.37 mm; p = .678)修复的腿筋肌腱。结论:与钛缝合线锚定相比,全缝合锚展示了类似的位移和较高的负荷,以发生更高的负载。临床相关性:本研究的结果表明,全缝合锚是钛缝合锚的等效替代,用于近端腿筋撕裂修复。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号