首页> 外文期刊>Orthopaedic Journal of Sports Medicine >Surgical Outcomes In The Frequency, Etiology, Direction, Severity (feds) Classification System For Shoulder Instability
【24h】

Surgical Outcomes In The Frequency, Etiology, Direction, Severity (feds) Classification System For Shoulder Instability

机译:频率,病因,方向,严重程度(FEDS)分类系统的外科结果,肩部不稳定

获取原文
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

Objectives: The Frequency, Etiology, Direction, Severity (FEDS) system is a reliable and reproducible classification of glenohumeral instability. Frequency is defined as Solitary (1), Occasional (2-5), or Frequent (&5) episodes per year; etiology as Traumatic or Atraumatic; direction as Anterior, Posterior, or Inferior; and severity as a Subluxation or Dislocation. 36 total combinations are possible, named by the first letter of each variable in order. The purpose of this descriptive study was to investigate epidemiology, surgical outcomes, and failure using FEDS in patients undergoing surgery in a large multicenter cohort of prospectively enrolled patients. Methods: 1204 patients undergoing surgery were assigned to FEDS categories. Two-year follow-up at time of analysis was available for 629 patients (85.7% of those eligible based on date of surgery). Those categories consisting of at least 5% of patients were further analyzed by patient reported outcomes (PROs) and failure rates for a total of 466 patients. PROs included American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons score (ASES), Western Ontario Shoulder Instability index (WOSI), and Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation (SANE). Failure benchmarks included rates of recurrent subluxation, dislocation, and revision surgery. Results: Sixteen categories represented at least one percent of patients. Occasional Traumatic Anterior Dislocation (OTAD) was the most common category with 16.4% of patients. Five other anterior categories (STAS, OTAS, FTAS, STAD, FTAD) and one posterior category (STPS) represented at least 5%. PROs and failure rates for anterior categories are summarized in Figure 1. PROs improved significantly for each category. A downward trend in WOSI and ASES was noted in particular with increasing frequency of the dislocation groups. The highest rates of each type of failure occurred in the occasional and frequent groups for both dislocation and subluxation. Low rates of failure occurred in STPS, with 17.9% reporting subluxation, 3.6% dislocation, and no revisions. Conclusion: While overall success was good, different FEDS categories showed varying degrees of improvement and failure rates, indicating that the system can be used to provide prognostic insight for presurgical education. Overall, outcomes for traumatic anterior instability decreased with higher initial frequency, showing worse PROs and higher failure. Frequency appeared to have the greatest effect on outcomes. Early surgical intervention may be beneficial in preventing progression to more severe FEDS categories, with higher frequency having previously been associated with both higher rates of bone loss and greater time between initial event and surgical stabilization.
机译:目的:频率,病因,方向,严重程度(FEDS)系统是Glenohumeral不稳定性的可靠和可重复的分类。频率被定义为单独(1),偶尔(2-5),或频繁(& 5)每年;病因是创伤或无法的;方向作为前部,后部或劣等;和严重程度作为子宫子或错位。 36个总组合是可能的,由每个变量的第一个字母命名为顺序。该描述性研究的目的是研究流行病学,手术结果和使用喂养的患者在大型多中心队列患者中进行手术的患者。方法:1204名接受手术的患者被分配给FED类别。 729名患者提供分析时的两年随访(符合手术日期的85.7%)。由患者报告的结果(优点)和失败率,共有5%的患者组成的那些类别,总共分析了466名患者。优点包括美国肩部和肘部外科医生得分(ASES),西部安大略省肩部不稳定指数(WOSI)和单一评估数值评估(SANE)。失败基准包括复发性Subluxation,错位和修订手术的率。结果:十六类类别占患者的至少一个。偶尔创伤前位脱位(OTAD)是最常见的类别,患者的16.4%。其他五个前提类别(STA,OTAS,FTA,StAD,FTAD)和一个后部类(STP)至少为5%。前提类别的专业利用率总结如图1所示。专业人员对每个类别的优点显着提高。沃西和ases的下降趋势特别是随着脱位群体的频率增加。偶尔和频繁的群体发生在偶尔和频繁的群体中发生的最高速率。 STPS发生的低失败率,报告的Subluxation报告,3.6%的错位,没有修订。结论:虽然整体成功良好,但不同的联邦品类别表现出不同程度的改善和失败利率,表明该系统可用于为公共教育提供预后洞察力。总体而言,创伤前稳定性的结果随着初始频率越高而降低,呈现更差的优势和更高的故障。频率似乎对结果产生了最大的影响。早期手术干预可能是有益的,防止进展到更严重的美联储类别,具有更高的频率,前面具有较高的骨损失率和初始事件和手术稳定之间的较大时间。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号