...
首页> 外文期刊>Orthopaedic Journal of Sports Medicine >Patients Undergoing Shoulder Stabilization Procedures Do Not Accurately Recall Their Preoperative Symptoms at Short- to Midterm Follow-up
【24h】

Patients Undergoing Shoulder Stabilization Procedures Do Not Accurately Recall Their Preoperative Symptoms at Short- to Midterm Follow-up

机译:接受肩部稳定程序的患者在短暂到中期随访时,不准确地召回其术前症状

获取原文

摘要

Background: A patient’s ability to recall symptoms is poor in some elderly populations, but we considered that the recall of younger patients may be more accurate. The accuracy of recall in younger patients after surgery has not been reported to date. Purpose: To assess younger patients’ abilities to recall their preoperative symptoms after having undergone shoulder stabilization surgery. We used 2 disease-specific, patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs)—the Western Ontario Shoulder Instability Index (WOSI) and the Melbourne Instability Shoulder Score (MISS)—at a period of up to 2 years postoperatively. Study Design: Cohort study (diagnosis); Level of evidence, 2. Methods: Participants (N = 119) were stratified into 2 groups: early recall (at 6-8 months postoperatively; n = 58) and late recall (at 9-24 months postoperatively; n = 61). All patients completed the PROMs with instructions to recall preoperative function. The mean and absolute differences between the preoperative scores and recalled scores for each PROM were compared using paired t tests. Correlations between the actual and recalled scores of the subsections for each PROM were calculated using an intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC). The number of individuals who recalled within the minimal detectable change (MDC) of each PROM was calculated. Results: Comparison between the means of the actual and recalled preoperative scores for both groups did not demonstrate significant differences (early recall differences, MISS 1.05 and WOSI –38.64; late recall differences, MISS –0.25 and WOSI –24.02). Evaluation of the absolute difference, however, revealed a significant difference between actual and recalled scores for both the late and early groups (early recall absolute differences, MISS 12.26 and WOSI 216.71; late recall absolute differences, MISS 12.84 and WOSI 290.08). Average absolute differences were above the MDC scores of both PROMs at both time points. Subsections of each PROM demonstrated weak to moderate correlations between actual and recalled scores (ICC range, 0.17-0.61). Total scores for the PROMs reached moderate agreement between actual and recalled scores. Conclusion: Individual recall after shoulder instability surgery was not accurate. However, the mean recalled PROM scores of each group were not significantly different from the actual scores collected preoperatively, and recall did not deteriorate significantly over 2 years. This suggests that recall of the individual, even in this younger group, cannot be considered accurate for research purposes.
机译:背景:患者回忆症状的能力在一些老年人口中较差,但我们认为召回患者的召回可能更准确。迄今尚未报告手术后患者召回的准确性。目的:评估年轻患者的能力在经过肩部稳定手术后回忆起术前症状。我们使用了2种疾病特异性患者报告的结果措施(PROMS) - 西部的安大略省肩部不稳定指数(WOSI)和墨尔本不稳定肩部评分(Miss) - 术后长达2年的时间。研究设计:队列研究(诊断);证据级别,2.方法:参与者(n = 119)分为2组:早期召回(术后6-8个月; n = 58)和晚期召回(术后9-24个月; n = 61)。所有患者均完成舞会,以召回术前功能。使用配对的T检验比较了术前分数和每个PROM召回的分数之间的平均值和绝对差异。使用脑内相关系数(ICC)计算每个PROM的实际和召回分数之间的相关性。计算每个PROM的最小可检测变化(MDC)内召回的个人数量。结果:两组实际和召回术前评分的手段之间的比较没有表现出显着差异(早期召回差异,小姐1.05和WOSI -38.64;迟到的回忆差异,Miss -0.25和WOSI -24.02)。然而,评估绝对差异,揭示了晚期和早期群体的实际和召回的分数之间的显着差异(早期召回绝对差异,小姐12.26和WOSI 216.71;晚召回绝对差异,小姐12.84和WOSI 290.08)。在两个时间点,平均绝对差异高于两次PROM的MDC分数。每个截匪的小节证明了实际和召回的分数之间的中等相关性(ICC系列,0.17-0.61)。 PROM的总成分达到了实际和召回的分数之间的温和协议。结论:肩部稳定性手术的个人召回不准确。然而,每组的平均召回奖励得分与术前收集的实际评分没有显着差异,并且召回在2年内不会显着恶化。这表明即使在这个较年轻的群体中也召回了个人,不能考虑用于研究目的的准确性。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号