...
首页> 外文期刊>Orthopaedic Journal of Sports Medicine >VALIDITY, MEANS, AND DISTRIBUTION OF THE HSS PEDI-FABS IN PEDIATRIC ATHLETES AND IN COMMON SPORTS
【24h】

VALIDITY, MEANS, AND DISTRIBUTION OF THE HSS PEDI-FABS IN PEDIATRIC ATHLETES AND IN COMMON SPORTS

机译:在儿科运动员和共同运动中HSS Pedi-Fabs的有效性,手段和分布

获取原文
           

摘要

BACKGROUND: Patient reported outcome measures (PROMs) measuring activity level can be crucial to a musculoskeletal provider in both a clinical and research setting. The HSS Pedi-FABS was developed as a generalizable measure of activity in children ages 10-18. However, existing literature validating this scale is limited by small patient populations leading to underrepresentation of multiple sports. The purpose of this study is to assess the validity of the HSS Pedi-FABS when used in a large pediatric population participating in various sports and evaluate the means and distribution of Pedi-FABS amongst common sports. METHODS: A retrospective review of 517 subjects who completed the HSS Pedi-FABS while presenting for knee evaluation was performed. Subjects were seen by one of five providers at a pediatric sport medicine center between October 2016 and June 2017. Subjects were included in analysis if they completed the HSS Pedi-FABS and had reported status as an athlete. Patient demographics, primary sport, multi-sport involvement, level of competition, frequency of play, HSS Pedi-FABS and Tegner Activity Level Scale (Tegner) scores were reviewed. The Tegner asked subjects to classify their activity level prior to injury. To determine validity, the HSS Pedi-FABS was compared to the Tegner. S-correlations were calculated between the two activity scales. Each scale was then correlated with level of activity and frequency of play. A t-test was run between the HSS Pedi-FABS scores and multi-sport involvement. Distributions of the HSS Pedi-FABS scores were calculated across the eight most frequent primary sports reported by the sample population. ANOVA analyses were performed with the HSS Pedi-FABS and Tegner Before scores of the eight primary sports. The ANOVA analyses were followed by t-tests for multiple comparisons. RESULTS: Of the 424 athletes included in the study, 227 (53.5%) were female and 197 (46.5%) were male. The mean age was 14.29 years (range: 6.48-22.35). 207 (48.8%) were multi-sport athletes while 215 (50.7%) were considered single-sport athletes. 2 (0.5%) had an unknown status. There was a significant difference between HSS Pedi-FABS scores of multi-sport athletes versus single-sport athletes (22.0 versus 20.36, respectfully, p=.027). Correlations were found between the HSS Pedi-FABS and days per week playing a primary sport (r=0.273; p&0.001), hours per week playing primary sport (r=0.292, p&0.001), and weeks NOT engaged in sports (r=-0.112, p=0.039). In this data, there was no correlation with perceived level of competition and HSS Pedi-FABS. There was no statistical correlation found between the HSS Pedi-FABS and the Tegner with a similar mean HSS Pedi FABS scores seen in each Tegner group &5. The Tegner scale did not statistically correlate with hours per week or days per week. The HSS Pedi-FABS showed a significant difference in scores between the eight most frequent primary sports (p=0.001). Subjects whose primary sport was Soccer scored significantly higher (23.57 ± 6.27) than those of Dance/Drill Team/Ballet (17.45 ± 6.38) and Track and Field/Running/Cross Country (17.47 ± 5.74, p=.001, .024). Frequency distributions of each sports are seen in Figure 1. CONCLUSION: The HSS Pedi-FABS, as compared to the Tegner, has significant correlation with time spent while playing a primary sport. Normal distribution of the HSS Pedi FABS may be different based on sports. Further analysis of multiple joints could provide a more comprehensive understanding of Pedi-FABS scoring trends in pediatric athletes. Figure 1. Representation of the score distribution in the top eight patient-reported sports.
机译:背景:患者报告的结果测量(PROMS)测量活性水平对于临床和研究环境中的肌肉骨骼提供者来说至关重要。 HSS Pedi-Fab被制定为10-18岁儿童活动的普遍性衡量标准。然而,验证该规模的现有文献受到患者普及多项体育普遍存在的小患者群体的限制。本研究的目的是评估HSS Pedi-Fab的有效性,当参与各种运动的大型儿科人口中,评估普通运动中Pedi-Fabs的手段和分配。方法:对517个受试者进行了回顾性审查,在进行膝关节评估时完成了HSS Pedi-Fab的主题。 2016年10月和2017年6月在2017年10月至6月在2017年10月至2017年6月之间看到了受试者。如果他们完成了HSS Pedi-Fab,则会在分析中包含受试者,并报告作为运动员的状态。审查了患者人口统计学,初级运动,多体育参与,竞争水平,频率,HSS Pedi-Fab和TEGNER活动水平规模(TEGNER)得分。 TEGNER要求受试者在受伤前对其活动水平进行分类。为了确定有效性,将HSS Pedi-Fab与Tegner进行比较。在两种活动尺度之间计算了S相关性。然后每种比例与活动水平和频率相关。在HSS Pedi-Fabs评分和多体育参与之间运行T检验。通过样本群体报告的八个最常见的初级运动,计算HSS Pedi-Fabs分数的分布。在八次初级运动的分数之前,使用HSS Pedi-Fab和Tegner进行ANOVA分析。 ANOVA分析之后是多次比较的T检验。结果:在研究中包含的424名运动员中,227名(53.5%)是女性,197名(46.5%)是男性。平均年龄为14.29年(范围:6.48-22.35)。 207(48.8%)是多运动运动员,而215(50.7%)被认为是单体育运动员。 2(0.5%)有一个未知的地位。 HSS Pedi-Fabs的多体育运动员与单体育运动员(22.0与20.36,恭敬,P = .027)之间存在显着差异。在HSS Pedi-Fab和每周播放初级运动的日间(r = 0.273; 0.001),每周播放初级运动的小时数(r = 0.292,p <0.001),以及未参与运动的数周( r = -0.112,p = 0.039)。在此数据中,与感知竞争水平和HSS Pedi-Fab没有相关性。 HSS Pedi-Fab和TEGNER之间没有发现统计相关性,其具有类似平均HSS PEDI FABS在每个TEGNER组中看到的分数。5。 TEGNER规模没有统计学相关,每周每周或每周几天都不相关。 HSS Pedi-Fab在八个最常见的初级运动(P = 0.001)之间显示出显着差异。主要运动是足球的主题明显更高(23.57±6.27)比舞蹈/钻头团队/芭蕾舞(17.45±6.38)和轨道和现场/运行/跨国(17.47±5.74,P = .001,.024) 。图1中可以看到每个运动的频率分布。结论:与TEGNER相比,HSS Pedi-Fabs与在播放初级运动时花费的时间具有显着的相关性。 HSS Pedi Fab的正态分布可能是基于运动的不同。对多个关节的进一步分析可以更全面地了解儿科运动员的Pedi-Fabs评分趋势。图1.前八个患者报告的运动中得分分布的表现。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号