首页> 外文期刊>Orthopaedic Journal of Sports Medicine >Meniscal Repair Outcomes in Revision ACL Reconstructions
【24h】

Meniscal Repair Outcomes in Revision ACL Reconstructions

机译:修订ACL重建中的半月板修复结果

获取原文
           

摘要

Objectives: Meniscal preservation has been demonstrated to contribute to long term knee health. This has been a successful intervention in the isolated and ACL reconstructed patient. The results of meniscus repair in the setting of revision ACL reconstruction have never been documented to any significant extent. The MARS group offers with its large cohort of revision ACL reconstructions the opportunity to explore this issue. Methods: The MARS Group was assembled with the aim of determining what impacts outcome in an ACL revision setting, and to identify potentially modifiable factors that could improve these outcomes. This collaboration consists of a group of 83 sports medicine fellowship trained surgeons across 52 IRB approved sites. Surgeons are a near equal mix of academic and private practitioners. Surgeons document surgical technique and intraarticular findings including meniscal and chondral damage and their treatment.All revision ACL reconstruction with meniscal repair cases from a multicenter group between 2006 and 2011 were selected. Two-year follow-up was obtained by both phone and email to determine whether any subsequent surgery had occurred to either knee since their initial revision ACL reconstruction. If so, operative reports were obtained, whenever possible, to verify pathologic condition and treatment. Results: 1215 patients were enrolled. 235 repairs were performed in 218 patients (19.5% of the cohort): 170 were medial, 65 lateral and 17 medial and lateral. 178 (76%) were performed with all-inside techniques. 17 repairs failed by 2 year follow up: 15 medial (8.8%; 13 all inside, 2 outside in) and 2 lateral (3.1%; both all inside). 4 of the medial failures were treated in conjunction with a subsequent repeat revision reconstruction. Conclusion: Meniscus repair in the revision setting is a successful treatment choice when appropriate. Failure rates for medial and lateral tears were both less than 10% and consistent with primary ACL reconstruction meniscus repair success rates. Medial tears underwent reoperation for failure at a statistically significant higher rate than lateral tears.
机译:目的:半月板保存已被证明为长期膝关节健康造成贡献。这一直是孤立和ACL重建患者的成功干预。在修订版ACL重建设置中的弯月面修复结果从未在任何显着程度上记录过。 MARS集团提供其大量修订版ACL重建有机会探索这个问题。方法:MARS集团的旨在确定ACL修订环境中的影响,并确定可能改善这些结果的可能性可修改因素。该合作包括一组83名体育医学奖学金培训的外科医生,跨越52名IRB批准的网站。外科医生是学术和私人从业者的近似平等混合。外科医生文件文献手术技术和胸腔内发现,包括半月板和骨髓损伤及其治疗。选择了2006年至2011年间多中心组的半月形修复案件的修订ACL重建。手机和电子邮件获得了两年的随访,以确定是否发生了任何后续手术,因为他们初步修订了ACL重建以来膝关节。如果是这样,可以在可能的情况下获得操作报告以验证病理状况和治疗。结果:1215名患者注册。 235患者进行修理(19.5%的队列):170例中内侧,65侧和17个内侧和外侧。通过内部技术进行178(76%)。 17次维修失败了2年后:15个内侧(8.8%; 13均在内,2外部)和2个横向(3.1%;都在内部)。 4内侧故障与随后的重复修订重建进行处理。结论:修订版中的弯月面维修是适当的成功治疗选择。内侧和横向眼泪的失败率均小于10%,与主要ACL重建弯月面维修成功率一致。内侧撕裂在统计上显着高于横向眼泪的统计学显着更高的速度进行重新进入。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号