首页> 外文期刊>Risk Management and Healthcare Policy >Effect of Insurance Type on Stage at Presentation, Surgical Approach, Tumor Recurrence and Cancer-Specific Survival in Resectable Non-Small Lung Cancer Patients
【24h】

Effect of Insurance Type on Stage at Presentation, Surgical Approach, Tumor Recurrence and Cancer-Specific Survival in Resectable Non-Small Lung Cancer Patients

机译:保险类型对术后阶段的影响,手术方法,肿瘤复发和癌症特异性存活中可重置的非小肺癌患者

获取原文
       

摘要

Purpose: The aim of this study was to identify the association between Thailand’s insurance types and stage at presentation, surgical approach, tumor recurrence and cancer-specific survival in resectable non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients in northern Thailand. Patients and Methods: Medical records of patients with NSCLC who underwent pulmonary resection at Chiang Mai University Hospital from January 2007 through December 2015 were retrospectively reviewed. Patients were divided into two groups: patients with the Universal Coverage Scheme (UCS) or Social Security Scheme (SSS) and patients with the Civil Servant Medical Benefit Scheme (CSMBS) or private insurance (PI). Patient characteristics were assessed. The primary outcome was cancer-specific survival while the secondary outcome was tumor recurrence. Cox’s regression and matching propensity score analysis was used to analyze data. Results: This study included 583 patients: 344 with UCS or SSS and 239 with CSMBS or PI. Patients with UCS or SSS were more likely to be active smokers, have a lower percent predicted FEV1, present with higher-stage tumors and worse differentiated tumors, present with tumor necrosis, and undergo an open surgical approach than those with CSMBS or PI. At multivariable analysis of all patients cohort, there were no significant differences in terms of early stage at presentation (adjusted odds ratio (ORsubadj/sub) = 0.94, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 0.65– 1.37), undergoing lobectomy (ORsubadj/sub = 0.59, 95% CI = 0.24– 1.46), and recurrent-free survival (adjusted hazard ratio (HRsubadj)/sub =1.20, 95% CI = 0.88– 1.65) between groups (UCS/SSS versus CSMBS/PI). However, patients with UCS or SSS had shorter cancer-specific survival (HRsubadj/sub = 1.61, 95% CI = 1.22– 2.15). The results from the propensity score matched patient cohort were not different from those analyses on the full patient cohort. Conclusion: Thai insurance types have an effect on cancer-specific survival. The Thai government should recognize the importance of these differences, and further multi-center studies with a larger sample size are warranted to confirm this result.
机译:目的:本研究的目的是确定泰国泰国可重置的非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC)患者的陈述,手术方法,肿瘤复发和癌症特异性生存之间的泰国保险类型和阶段之间的关联。患者及方法:从2007年1月到2015年12月在2015年1月到2015年12月,患有NSCLC患者的NSCLC患者的病程被回顾地审查。患者分为两组:患者普及覆盖计划(UCS)或社会保障计划(SSS)和公务员医疗福利计划(CSMBB)或私人保险(PI)的患者。评估患者特征。主要结果是癌症特异性存活,而次要结果是肿瘤复发。 COX的回归和匹配倾向评分分析用于分析数据。结果:本研究包括583名患者:344例,具有CSMB或PI的UCS或SSS和239例。患有UCS或SSS的患者更有可能是活性吸烟者,百分比预测的FEV1,患有较高阶段的肿瘤和较差的分化肿瘤,存在于肿瘤坏死,并且经历开放的手术方法,比CSMB或PI的开放手术方法。在对所有患者队列的多变分析时,呈现早期阶段没有显着差异(调节的差距(或<亚jame )= 0.94,95%置信区间(CI)= 0.65- 1.37) ,接受叶片切除术(或 adj = 0.59,95%Ci = 0.24-1.46),可复发存活(调节危险比(Hr adj) = 1.20,95% CI = 0.88- 1.65)组之间(UCS / SSS与CSMBS / PI)之间。然而,UCS或SSS的患者具有更短的癌症存活率(HR ADJ = 1.61,95%CI = 1.22-2.15)。倾向得分匹配患者群体的结果与全患者队列的分析没有不同。结论:泰国保险类型对癌症特异性生存产生影响。泰国政府应该认识到这些差异的重要性,并有权进行更大的样本量的多中心研究,以确认这一结果。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号