...
首页> 外文期刊>Revista Brasileira de Psiquiatria >Comment on “At-risk drinking and current cannabis use among medical students: a multivariable analysis of the role of personality traits”
【24h】

Comment on “At-risk drinking and current cannabis use among medical students: a multivariable analysis of the role of personality traits”

机译:评论“医学生的风险饮酒和当前大麻使用:对人格特质作用的多变量分析”

获取原文

摘要

The paper by Schwarzbold et al.1 comments on therelatively unique population of medical students, whichdiffers from the broader general population on key factorssuch as general intelligence, academic and careermotivation, and self-selection to a helping profession.Thus, the data need to be understood in proper context. Ingeneral, the observed associations between the FiveFactor Model of Personality (Big Five), Behavioral Inhibitionand Activation Systems scales (BIS/BAS) and alcoholand marijuana use are generally consistent with the existingliterature in the broader population, and consistent withfindings from other countries and continents. However,some findings from this report are equivocal or do notsupport the broader literature regarding some specificsubscales of the Big Five and BIS/BAS. Additionally, theresults are partially complicated by a lack of observedassociation between depression and anxiety scores andthe Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-4), which mightbe expected in a sufficient sample size (here, n 4 700).However, the authors appropriately raise the possibilitythat the lack of measurement sensitivity in the screeninginstruments may have played a role in the observedresults. Overall, then, generalizing outside this medicalschool population to the broader population may be premature.It might, however, suggest there are unique profileswithin medical-student populations (vs. the generalpopulation), or perhaps more conservatively, withinmedical students in southern Brazil.
机译:Schwarzbold等人的论文对医学生人口的相关性,来自更广泛的一般人口的普遍智力,学术和传票的关键因素,以及自我选择,以及帮助职业.Thus,数据需要在适当的背景下理解。 Ingeneral,观察到的人格模型(大五)之间的关联(大五),行为抑制和激活系统秤(BIS / BAS)和醇和大麻用途通常与更广泛人群中的现有阶段一致,以及来自其他国家和大陆的挑战一致。然而,来自此报告的一些发现是等因素或不支持大五个和BIS / BAS的一些细节管理员的更广泛的文献。此外,认为抑郁和焦虑评分和患者健康调查问卷(PHQ-4)之间的观察分配缺乏观察到的患者,其中,这在足够的样本大小(这里,N 4 700)之间。然而,作者适当地提高了可能性。屏幕仪器中缺乏测量敏感性可能在观察到的情况下发挥作用。因此,总体而言,这一点,在这个医学学校人口之外向更广泛的人口概括可能会过早。然而,这可能表明了有独特的案例,医学 - 学生人口(与一般性化),或者更保守地,在巴西南部的医学生中。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号