...
首页> 外文期刊>Radiation Oncology Journal >Intensity-modulated radiotherapy for stage I glottic cancer: a short-term outcomes compared with three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy
【24h】

Intensity-modulated radiotherapy for stage I glottic cancer: a short-term outcomes compared with three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy

机译:IS阶段的强度调节放射疗法是阶段的阶段癌症:与三维保形放射疗法相比的短期结果

获取原文
           

摘要

Purpose To investigate the differences in treatment outcomes between two radiation techniques, intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) and three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy (3DCRT). Materials and Methods We retrospectively analyzed 160 (IMRT = 23, 3DCRT = 137) patients with stage I glottic cancer treated from January 2005 through December 2016. The IMRT was performed with TomoTherapy (16 patients), volumetric-modulated arc therapy (6 patients), and step-and-shoot technique (1 patient), respectively. The 3DCRT was performed with bilateral parallel opposing fields. The median follow-up duration was 30 months (range, 31 to 42 months) in the IMRT group and 65 months (range, 20 to 143 months) in the 3DCRT group. Results The 5-year overall survival and 3-year local control rates of the 160 patients were 95.7% and 91.4%, respectively. There was no significant difference in 3-year local control rates between the IMRT and 3DCRT groups (94.4% vs. 91.0%; p = 0.587). Thirteen of 137 patients in the 3DCRT group had recurrences. In the IMRT group, one patient had a recurrence at the true vocal cord. Patients treated with IMRT had less grade 2 skin reaction than the 3DCRT group, but this had no statistical significance (4.3% vs. 21.2%; p = 0.080). Conclusion IMRT had comparable outcomes with 3DCRT, and a trend of less acute skin reaction in stage I glottic cancer patients.
机译:目的探讨两种辐射技术,强度调制放疗(IMRT)和三维保形放射治疗(3DCRT)之间治疗结果的差异。我们回顾性分析的材料和方法160(IMRT = 23,3DCRT = 137)阶段阶段的阶段,从2005年1月至2016年12月治疗。IMRT进行了Comotherapy(16名患者),体积调制的ARC疗法(6名患者)进行和阶梯和拍摄技术(1例患者)。 3DCRT由双边并行相对领域进行。 IMRT集团的中位随访时间为30个月(范围,31至42个月),35个月(范围为20至143个月)。结果160例患者的5年整体生存和3年局部控制率分别为95.7%和91.4%。 IMRT和3DCRT组之间的3年局部控制率没有显着差异(94.4%与91.0%; P = 0.587)。 3DCRT组织137名137名患者的复发。在IMRT集团中,一名患者在真正的声带中复发。患有IMRT治疗的患者比3DCRT组的2级皮肤反应,但这没有统计学意义(4.3%vs.2.2%; P = 0.080)。结论IMRT与3DCRT的绩效相当的结果,阶段I阶段急性皮肤反应较少的趋势。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号