首页> 外文期刊>Reproductive Health >Beyond health system contact: measuring and validating quality of childbirth care indicators in primary level facilities of northern Ethiopia
【24h】

Beyond health system contact: measuring and validating quality of childbirth care indicators in primary level facilities of northern Ethiopia

机译:超越卫生系统联系方式:在埃塞俄比亚北部初级设施中测量和验证分娩保健指标

获取原文
           

摘要

Measurement of quality of health care has been largely overlooked and continues to be a major health system bottleneck in monitoring performance and quality to evaluate progress against defined targets for better decision making. Hence, metrics of maternity care are needed to advance from health service contact alone to content of care. We assessed the accuracy of indicators that describe the quality of basic care for childbirth functions both at the individual level as well as at the population level in Northern Ethiopia. A validation study was conducted by comparing women’s self-reported coverage of maternal and newborn health interventions during intra-partum and immediate postpartum care received in primary level care facilities of Northern Ethiopia against a gold standard of direct observation by a trained third party (n?=?478). Sensitivity, specificity and individual-level reporting accuracy via the area under the receiver operating curve (AUC) and inflation factor (IF) to estimate population-level accuracy for each indicator was applied for validity analysis. 455(97.5%) of women completed the survey describing health interventions. Thirty-two (43.2%) of the 93-basic quality child birth care indicators that were assessed could be accurately measure at the facility and population level (AUC??0.60 and 0.75??IF?1.25). Few of the valid indicators were: whether women and their companion were greeted respectfully, whether an HIV test was offered, and whether severe bleeding (hemorrhage) was experienced by the woman. An additional 21(28.4%) indicators accurately measure at the facility or individual level, but the indicators under or over estimate at population level. Thirteen other indicators could accurately measure at population level. Eight (8.6%) indicators didn’t meet either of the validity criteria. Women were able to accurately report on several indicators of quality for basic child birth care. For those few indicators that required a technical understanding tended to have higher don’t know response from the women. Therefore, valid indicators should be included as a potential measurement of quality for the childbirth care process to ensure that essential interventions are delivered.
机译:保健质量的测量基本上被忽视,并继续成为监测绩效和质量的主要卫生系统瓶颈,以评估针对更好决策的定义目标的进展。因此,需要从健康服务接触到护理内容的卫生服务接触所需的孕产性护理指标。我们评估了描述在埃塞俄比亚北部的个人水平以及人口水平的分娩职能的基本职能质量的准确性。通过比较妇女的自我报告的妇女和新生儿健康干预措施,并在埃塞俄比亚北部北埃塞俄比亚的初级护理设施中接受训练的第三方直接观察的黄金标准(n? =?478)。通过接收器操作曲线(AUC)下的区域和通胀因子(IF)的敏感性,特异性和个体级报告准确性,以估计每个指标的人口水平精度被应用于有效性分析。 455(97.5%)妇女完成了调查描述了健康干预措施。在设施和人口水平(AUC?> 0.60和0.75?<?如果<1.25),可以准确衡量评估的93基本质量儿童孕育指标的32-2个(43.2%)。少数有效指标是:是否尊重妇女和他们的伴侣,是否提供了艾滋病毒检验,以及该女子是否经历过严重出血(出血)。额外的21(28.4%)指标准确地衡量设施或个人水平,但在人口层面估计下或过度下的指标。 13个其他指标可以准确衡量人口水平。八(8.6%)指标没有符合任何有效性标准。妇女能够准确地报告基本儿童避孕药的几种质量指标。对于那些需要技术理解的少数指标往往有更高的不知道妇女的回应。因此,应包括有效指标作为分娩护理过程的质量潜在测量,以确保提供必要的干预措施。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号