首页> 外文期刊>Renal replacement therapy. >Comparison of clinical effects between icodextrin and glucose solutions on outcomes of peritoneal dialysis: systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
【24h】

Comparison of clinical effects between icodextrin and glucose solutions on outcomes of peritoneal dialysis: systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

机译:突骨膜透析结果与腹膜透析结果的临床疗效比较:随机对照试验的系统综述与荟萃分析

获取原文
           

摘要

Icodextrin enhances peritoneal filtration for patients on peritoneal dialysis (PD). However, clinically important outcomes have not yet been analyzed using authentic, objective statistical methods. The present systematic review aimed to determine the risks and benefits of icodextrin compared with a glucose-based solution with respect to clinically important and patient-centered outcomes. We systematically investigated only randomized controlled trials (RCTs) by adopting the Cochrane Database of Systematic Review (2014) and searched the CENTRAL, MEDLINE, and EMBASE databases for eligible studies reported in the literature. The quality of the evidence was assessed using the GRADE approach. We finally evaluated important outcomes in 13 RCTs. Icodextrin significantly decreased the number of reported episodes of uncontrolled fluid overload in four RCTs that involved 236 patients (relative risk [RR], 0.31; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.12 to 0.82; moderate certainty evidence). However, the inclusion of icodextrin for peritoneal ultrafiltration did not significantly differ in six RCTs involving 252 patients (mean difference [MD], 186.76?mL; 95% CI, ??47.08 to 420.59; low certainty evidence). Regarding other clinically important outcomes, all-cause mortality in 10 RCTs involving 1106 patients (RR, 0.75; 95% CI, 0.33 to 1.71; low certainty evidence) and technical survival in five RCTs involving 470 patients (RR, 0.57; 95%CI, 0.29 to 1.12; low certainty evidence) were not significant. Urine volume in four RCTs involving 136 patients, residual renal function in five RCTs involving 181 patients and peritoneal function measured as the ratio of solute concentration in dialysate and plasma (D/P ratio) in two RCTs involving 105 patients were not specifically affected by icodextrin, and the results for adverse events were similar between icodextrin and glucose PD solutions. Icodextrin could relieve uncontrolled fluid overload without adding risk. However, a significant effect on clinically relevant outcomes such as technical survival and overall patient survival was not suggested. More trials are required to increase the statistical power and to verify the value of icodextrin in clinical practice.
机译:Icodextrin提高腹膜透析患者的腹​​膜过滤(PD)。但是,尚未使用真实的客观统计方法分析临床重要的结果。目前的系统审查旨在确定Icodextrin的风险和益处与基于葡萄糖的解决方案相对于临床重要的和患者为中心的结果。我们通过采用系统审查的Cochrane数据库系统地系统地调查了随机对照试验(RCT),并在文献中搜索了中央,MEDLINE和EMBASE数据库以进行符合条件的研究。使用等级方法评估证据的质量。我们最终在13个RCT中评估了重要的结果。 Icodextrin显着降低了涉及236名患者的四个RCT的不受控制的流体过载的疾病的数量(相对风险[RR],0.31; 95%置信区间[CI],0.12至0.82;中等确定性证据)。然而,在涉及252名患者的六个RCT中包含ICODEXTRIN对腹膜超滤的显着不同(平均差异[MD],186.76?ml; 95%CI,?? 47.08至420.59;低确定性证据)。关于其他临床重要的结果,10个RCT中的所有原因死亡率涉及1106名患者(RR,0.75; 95%CI,0.33至1.71;低鉴定性证据)和涉及470名患者的五个RCT的技术存活(RR,0.57; 95%CI ,0.29至1.12;低确定性证据)并不重要。尿量在四个RCT中涉及136名患者,5例RCT中的残留肾功能涉及181名患者和腹膜函数,以涉及105名患者的两个RCT中的透析液和血浆(D / P比率)的溶质浓度(D / P比率)没有特别受Icodextrin的影响,并且不良事件的结果在Icodextrin和葡萄糖PD溶液之间相似。 Icodextrin可以减轻不受控制的流体过载而不会增加风险。然而,没有提出对临床相关结果的显着影响,例如技术生存和整体患者存活。需要更多的试验来增加统计能力并验证Icodextrin在临床实践中的价值。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号