首页> 外文期刊>Nursing Open >Design, delivery and evaluation of a simulation‐based workshop for health professional students on falls prevention in acute care settings
【24h】

Design, delivery and evaluation of a simulation‐based workshop for health professional students on falls prevention in acute care settings

机译:基于模拟的卫生专业学生研讨会的设计,交付和评估急性护理环境中预防的

获取原文
           

摘要

Aims and objectives To describe the design, delivery and evaluation outcomes of a simulation‐based educational workshop to teach a patient‐centred falls prevention strategy to health professional students tasked with implementing the strategy during clinical placement. Background Falls are among the most common and costly threat to patient safety. The Safe Recovery Programme (SRP) is an evidence‐based, one‐to‐one communication approach with demonstrated efficacy at preventing falls in the postgraduate context. Simulation‐based education (SBE) is commonly used to address issues of patient safety but has not been widely incorporated into falls prevention. Methods This study was a Pre–Post‐test intervention design. Health professional students were taught how to deliver the SRP in an SBE workshop. The workshop incorporated content delivery, role‐play simulations and interactions with a simulated patient. Students completed surveys immediately before and after the workshop and after clinical placement. Linear and logistic regression analysis was undertaken to identify differences within each pairwise comparison at the three time points. Qualitative free text responses underwent content analysis. Results There were 178 students trained. The educational design of the programme described in this paper was highly valued by students. Following the workshop, students' falls knowledge increased and they correctly identified evidence‐based strategies except bedrail use and patient sitters. Following clinical placement, fewer SBE students correctly identified evidence surrounding bed alarm use. Students became more confident about falls communication post‐SBE; however, this confidence decreased postclinical placement. Motivation to implement the SRP decreased between postworkshop and postclinical placement time points. Conclusions Falls research often includes educational components but previous studies have failed to adequately describe educational methods. Students learnt about best evidence falls prevention strategies using interactive educational methodologies with a workshop viewed by students as being well‐designed and assisting their learning from theory to practice. While students valued the delivery of the SRP using SBE, confidence and motivation to implement falls strategies were not sustained following clinical placement. A programme of education including SBE can be used to support the delivery of falls‐based education, but further research is needed to identify what factors may influence student's motivation and confidence to implement falls prevention strategies during clinical placement.
机译:旨在描述基于模拟的教育研讨会的设计,交付和评估结果,以教导患者以患者为中心的堕落策略为卫生专业学生任务在临床安置期间执行策略。背景下降是对患者安全的最常见和昂贵的威胁之一。安全恢复程序(SRP)是一种基于证据的一对一的通信方法,具有在研究生背景下的预防下降时的疗效。基于仿真的教育(SBE)通常用于解决患者安全问题,但尚未被广泛融入预防下降。方法本研究是测试前干预设计。卫生专业学生被教导如何在SBE研讨会中提供SRP。研讨会掺入了与模拟患者的内容递送,角色扮演模拟和相互作用。学生在车间之前和之后完成了调查以及临床安置后。进行线性和逻辑回归分析,以识别三个时间点在每对成对比较中的差异。定性免费文本响应接受内容分析。结果有178名学生培训。本文描述的计划的教育设计受到学生的高度重视。在研讨会之后,学生的堕落知识增加,除了卧铺使用和患者侦察员外,他们正确确定了基于证据的策略。临床安置后,较少的SBE学生正确识别围绕床报警的证据。学生对SBE的瀑布通信变得更加自信;然而,这种信心减少了节目术语。实现SRP的动机在后期业务场和中间扫描的时间点之间减少。结论跌倒研究通常包括教育组成部分,但之前的研究未能充分描述教育方法。学生了解最佳证据,使用互动教育方法的预防策略与学生观看的讲习班,作为精心设计,协助他们从理论练习的学习。虽然学生使用SRP使用SRP的交付,但在临床安置后不持续到实施跌倒策略的信心和动力。包括SBE在内的教育计划可用于支持提供基于堕落的教育,但需要进一步的研究来确定可能影响学生的动机和信心,以在临床安置期间实施落下的预防策略。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号